MHB Construct $\sqrt[4]{x^4+y^4}$ Segment with Straightedge & Compass

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on constructing a segment of length $\sqrt[4]{x^4+y^4}$ using a straightedge and compass. Albert's proposed solution is accepted by some, provided calculators are allowed for intermediate values, but others criticize it for requiring predefined lengths like 1 and $\sqrt{2}$. The conventional straightedge and compass method does not assume any unit of length, making it challenging to derive lengths that aren't directly obtainable from the given segments. An alternative solution is praised for its geometric elegance, emphasizing the importance of adhering to the construction rules. The conversation also hints at exploring methods to construct a segment of length $xy$ from segments $x$ and $y$.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Given two segments of lengths $x$ and $y$, construct with a straightedge and a compass a segment of length $\sqrt[4]{x^4+y^4}$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org

Attachments

  • Geometry Challenge.jpg
    Geometry Challenge.jpg
    15 KB · Views: 116
Thanks Albert for participating...I think your solution works, if we're allowed to use the calculator to compute the values for both $a$ and $c$ and since there is no restriction to the problem, you've successfully cracked the problem!:)

A solution proposed by other:
Note that $x^4+y^4=(x^2+\sqrt{2}xy+y^2)(x^2-\sqrt{2}xy+y^2)$, hence, we then have

$\sqrt[4]{x^4+y^4}=\sqrt{\sqrt{x^2+\sqrt{2}xy+y^2}\cdot \sqrt{x^2-\sqrt{2}xy+y^2}}$

By applying the law of cosines, we can construct segments of lengths $\sqrt{x^2\pm\sqrt{2}xy+y^2}$ using triangle of sides $x$ and $y$ with the angle between them $45^{\circ}$ and $135^{\circ}$.

Note also that if we are given two segments of lengths $a$ and $b$, we can construct a segment of length $\sqrt{ab}$ as the altitude $PD$ in a right triangle $PQR$ ($\angle P=90^{\circ}$) with $QD=a$ and $RD=b$. These two steps combined give the method for constructing $\sqrt[4]{x^4+y^4}$.

Isn't it a very beautiful geometry problem that deserves the best of applause?(Clapping)(Sun)
 
anemone said:
Thanks Albert for participating...I think your solution works, if we're allowed to use the calculator to compute the values for both $a$ and $c$ and since there is no restriction to the problem, you've successfully cracked the problem!:)

A solution proposed by other:
Note that $x^4+y^4=(x^2+\sqrt{2}xy+y^2)(x^2-\sqrt{2}xy+y^2)$, hence, we then have

$\sqrt[4]{x^4+y^4}=\sqrt{\sqrt{x^2+\sqrt{2}xy+y^2}\cdot \sqrt{x^2-\sqrt{2}xy+y^2}}$

By applying the law of cosines, we can construct segments of lengths $\sqrt{x^2\pm\sqrt{2}xy+y^2}$ using triangle of sides $x$ and $y$ with the angle between them $45^{\circ}$ and $135^{\circ}$.

Note also that if we are given two segments of lengths $a$ and $b$, we can construct a segment of length $\sqrt{ab}$ as the altitude $PD$ in a right triangle $PQR$ ($\angle P=90^{\circ}$) with $QD=a$ and $RD=b$. These two steps combined give the method for constructing $\sqrt[4]{x^4+y^4}$.

Isn't it a very beautiful geometry problem that deserves the best of applause?(Clapping)(Sun)
I don't use the calculator to compute the values for both $a,b$ and $c$
They can be constructed with a straightedge and a compass as below:
View attachment 2528

also see post #2
 

Attachments

  • construct a and b.jpg
    construct a and b.jpg
    17.3 KB · Views: 94
Last edited:
anemone said:
Thanks Albert for participating...I think your solution works, if we're allowed to use the calculator to compute the values for both $a$ and $c$ and since there is no restriction to the problem, you've successfully cracked the problem!:)

A solution proposed by other:
Note that $x^4+y^4=(x^2+\sqrt{2}xy+y^2)(x^2-\sqrt{2}xy+y^2)$, hence, we then have

$\sqrt[4]{x^4+y^4}=\sqrt{\sqrt{x^2+\sqrt{2}xy+y^2}\cdot \sqrt{x^2-\sqrt{2}xy+y^2}}$

By applying the law of cosines, we can construct segments of lengths $\sqrt{x^2\pm\sqrt{2}xy+y^2}$ using triangle of sides $x$ and $y$ with the angle between them $45^{\circ}$ and $135^{\circ}$.

Note also that if we are given two segments of lengths $a$ and $b$, we can construct a segment of length $\sqrt{ab}$ as the altitude $PD$ in a right triangle $PQR$ ($\angle P=90^{\circ}$) with $QD=a$ and $RD=b$. These two steps combined give the method for constructing $\sqrt[4]{x^4+y^4}$.

Isn't it a very beautiful geometry problem that deserves the best of applause?(Clapping)(Sun)
The solution given by "other" is indeed a beautiful geometric construction. The difficulty I have with Albert's solution is that it requires the use of line segments of length $1$ and $\sqrt2$. The convention in straightedge and compass constructions is that the straightedge is not marked with units. There is no unit of length implied by the initial data, which simply consists of two line segments whose lengths are announced to be $x$ and $y$. There is no means to construct line segments whose length cannot be obtained (using the straightedge and compass) from those of the given initial segments.
 
Opalg said:
The solution given by "other" is indeed a beautiful geometric construction. The difficulty I have with Albert's solution is that it requires the use of line segments of length $1$ and $\sqrt2$. The convention in straightedge and compass constructions is that the straightedge is not marked with units. There is no unit of length implied by the initial data, which simply consists of two line segments whose lengths are announced to be $x$ and $y$. There is no means to construct line segments whose length cannot be obtained (using the straightedge and compass) from those of the given initial segments.
if the length of unit 1 can be determined ,then $\sqrt 2$ can be set easily

now I am thinking a method using segmets x and y to construct a segment xy (can this be

done?)
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top