MHB Construct $\sqrt[4]{x^4+y^4}$ Segment with Straightedge & Compass

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on constructing a segment of length $\sqrt[4]{x^4+y^4}$ using a straightedge and compass. Albert's proposed solution is accepted by some, provided calculators are allowed for intermediate values, but others criticize it for requiring predefined lengths like 1 and $\sqrt{2}$. The conventional straightedge and compass method does not assume any unit of length, making it challenging to derive lengths that aren't directly obtainable from the given segments. An alternative solution is praised for its geometric elegance, emphasizing the importance of adhering to the construction rules. The conversation also hints at exploring methods to construct a segment of length $xy$ from segments $x$ and $y$.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Given two segments of lengths $x$ and $y$, construct with a straightedge and a compass a segment of length $\sqrt[4]{x^4+y^4}$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org

Attachments

  • Geometry Challenge.jpg
    Geometry Challenge.jpg
    15 KB · Views: 121
Thanks Albert for participating...I think your solution works, if we're allowed to use the calculator to compute the values for both $a$ and $c$ and since there is no restriction to the problem, you've successfully cracked the problem!:)

A solution proposed by other:
Note that $x^4+y^4=(x^2+\sqrt{2}xy+y^2)(x^2-\sqrt{2}xy+y^2)$, hence, we then have

$\sqrt[4]{x^4+y^4}=\sqrt{\sqrt{x^2+\sqrt{2}xy+y^2}\cdot \sqrt{x^2-\sqrt{2}xy+y^2}}$

By applying the law of cosines, we can construct segments of lengths $\sqrt{x^2\pm\sqrt{2}xy+y^2}$ using triangle of sides $x$ and $y$ with the angle between them $45^{\circ}$ and $135^{\circ}$.

Note also that if we are given two segments of lengths $a$ and $b$, we can construct a segment of length $\sqrt{ab}$ as the altitude $PD$ in a right triangle $PQR$ ($\angle P=90^{\circ}$) with $QD=a$ and $RD=b$. These two steps combined give the method for constructing $\sqrt[4]{x^4+y^4}$.

Isn't it a very beautiful geometry problem that deserves the best of applause?(Clapping)(Sun)
 
anemone said:
Thanks Albert for participating...I think your solution works, if we're allowed to use the calculator to compute the values for both $a$ and $c$ and since there is no restriction to the problem, you've successfully cracked the problem!:)

A solution proposed by other:
Note that $x^4+y^4=(x^2+\sqrt{2}xy+y^2)(x^2-\sqrt{2}xy+y^2)$, hence, we then have

$\sqrt[4]{x^4+y^4}=\sqrt{\sqrt{x^2+\sqrt{2}xy+y^2}\cdot \sqrt{x^2-\sqrt{2}xy+y^2}}$

By applying the law of cosines, we can construct segments of lengths $\sqrt{x^2\pm\sqrt{2}xy+y^2}$ using triangle of sides $x$ and $y$ with the angle between them $45^{\circ}$ and $135^{\circ}$.

Note also that if we are given two segments of lengths $a$ and $b$, we can construct a segment of length $\sqrt{ab}$ as the altitude $PD$ in a right triangle $PQR$ ($\angle P=90^{\circ}$) with $QD=a$ and $RD=b$. These two steps combined give the method for constructing $\sqrt[4]{x^4+y^4}$.

Isn't it a very beautiful geometry problem that deserves the best of applause?(Clapping)(Sun)
I don't use the calculator to compute the values for both $a,b$ and $c$
They can be constructed with a straightedge and a compass as below:
View attachment 2528

also see post #2
 

Attachments

  • construct a and b.jpg
    construct a and b.jpg
    17.3 KB · Views: 96
Last edited:
anemone said:
Thanks Albert for participating...I think your solution works, if we're allowed to use the calculator to compute the values for both $a$ and $c$ and since there is no restriction to the problem, you've successfully cracked the problem!:)

A solution proposed by other:
Note that $x^4+y^4=(x^2+\sqrt{2}xy+y^2)(x^2-\sqrt{2}xy+y^2)$, hence, we then have

$\sqrt[4]{x^4+y^4}=\sqrt{\sqrt{x^2+\sqrt{2}xy+y^2}\cdot \sqrt{x^2-\sqrt{2}xy+y^2}}$

By applying the law of cosines, we can construct segments of lengths $\sqrt{x^2\pm\sqrt{2}xy+y^2}$ using triangle of sides $x$ and $y$ with the angle between them $45^{\circ}$ and $135^{\circ}$.

Note also that if we are given two segments of lengths $a$ and $b$, we can construct a segment of length $\sqrt{ab}$ as the altitude $PD$ in a right triangle $PQR$ ($\angle P=90^{\circ}$) with $QD=a$ and $RD=b$. These two steps combined give the method for constructing $\sqrt[4]{x^4+y^4}$.

Isn't it a very beautiful geometry problem that deserves the best of applause?(Clapping)(Sun)
The solution given by "other" is indeed a beautiful geometric construction. The difficulty I have with Albert's solution is that it requires the use of line segments of length $1$ and $\sqrt2$. The convention in straightedge and compass constructions is that the straightedge is not marked with units. There is no unit of length implied by the initial data, which simply consists of two line segments whose lengths are announced to be $x$ and $y$. There is no means to construct line segments whose length cannot be obtained (using the straightedge and compass) from those of the given initial segments.
 
Opalg said:
The solution given by "other" is indeed a beautiful geometric construction. The difficulty I have with Albert's solution is that it requires the use of line segments of length $1$ and $\sqrt2$. The convention in straightedge and compass constructions is that the straightedge is not marked with units. There is no unit of length implied by the initial data, which simply consists of two line segments whose lengths are announced to be $x$ and $y$. There is no means to construct line segments whose length cannot be obtained (using the straightedge and compass) from those of the given initial segments.
if the length of unit 1 can be determined ,then $\sqrt 2$ can be set easily

now I am thinking a method using segmets x and y to construct a segment xy (can this be

done?)
 
Thread 'Erroneously  finding discrepancy in transpose rule'
Obviously, there is something elementary I am missing here. To form the transpose of a matrix, one exchanges rows and columns, so the transpose of a scalar, considered as (or isomorphic to) a one-entry matrix, should stay the same, including if the scalar is a complex number. On the other hand, in the isomorphism between the complex plane and the real plane, a complex number a+bi corresponds to a matrix in the real plane; taking the transpose we get which then corresponds to a-bi...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
55
Views
8K