Constructing an Energy-Collecting Apparatus for Physics Experiment

AI Thread Summary
The experiment aims to construct an energy-collecting apparatus to maximize energy concentration from a 250 Watt heat lamp for heating water in a film canister. The heat lamp will be positioned 1.2m above the floor, and the apparatus must not exceed 0.9m in height while allowing easy access to the canister. Suggestions include using a parabolic reflector to enhance energy collection, with the reflector positioned below the canister for optimal heat focus. Experimenting with a visible heat source, like a candle, can help determine the best placement for the reflector. Effective design and positioning are crucial for successful energy transfer to the water.
dragos
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
The purpose of this experiment is to construct an energy-collecting apparatus to concentrate as much energy from a provided 250 Watt heat lamp as possible. This energy is to be used to heat a mass of water. (the water will be given at a fixed temperature in a 35 mm film canister).
The heat lamp will be positioned 1.2m above the floor and the construction of the apparatus can't be higher then 0.9m, and the film canister should be easily put in the apparatus and taken out.
Anyone have any ideas?
please help...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A parabolic reflector (or two...) comes to mind
 
parabolic reflector

ic.. but where should i position the parabolic reflector, since i can't do anything to the lamp given in this experiment.
-as i understand I am supposed to build some kinda box that will attract as much heat as possible in order to heat the water.
 
The reflector should be below the canister, which must be a bit further away from its focus. Since you know the dimensions of the setup you can experiment with a visible source (candle?) to locate the optimum point.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top