Constructing an Engine with Adjustable Capacity: Is it Possible?

  • Thread starter Thread starter aniket
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacity Engine
AI Thread Summary
Constructing an engine with adjustable capacity is feasible, as demonstrated by existing technologies like Chrysler's Hemi, which deactivates cylinders to improve fuel efficiency. Similar systems, such as Displacement on Demand (DOD) used by Honda and GM, allow engines to switch between higher and lower capacities based on power needs, enhancing fuel economy by 10-15%. The concept could also extend to hybrid systems, where multiple engines could be activated or deactivated as required. Long-haul trucks could benefit from this technology by utilizing electric motors for better traction and efficiency. Overall, advancements in engine design are making adjustable capacity engines a practical reality.
aniket
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi friends,
Can we construct an engine that can shift its engine capacity i.e. CC. Means if we are looking for power , we can go for option with higher capacity & when we demand for better milage we can go for engine with lower capacity.Is there any such engine available?
Any help is welcome.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The new chyrstler Hemi C is an 8 cylinder, but it turns off 4 of the cylinders on the highway to get better gas milage. All you would have to do is cut off the fuel injection into the cylinders you don't want to use, and leave the exhaust valve port open so it doesn't have any compression. Although that would require quite a big of modifications, and would'nt be very nice
 
In addition to some of the new Chrysler Hemi (the high-performance models don't get it), Mercedes Benz has had it on their V12 for a while now, GM has it on their 5.3L and 6.0L V8 engines (not the Corvette one) and notably had the most famous implementation in the early eighties Cadillac that didn't work very well.

Honda is suppossed to offer the DOD (Displacement on Demand) technology on their Accord V6 and in theory other manufacturers are doing the same or considering it now that the technology is reliable and becoming a selling point.

Something like 10-15% increase in fuel economy because of the reduced pumping losses.
 
DOD via multiple motors

You could also use several engines and turn them off separately according to how much power is needed. This might be easiest to implement in a serial ICE/electric hybrid.

I was thinking this might be a good idea for long-haul trucks. The need very little power on the interstates. They also have a hard time in snow, so there might be electric motors on each wheel and an ICE by each wheel so that the truck could have 18-wheel drive (or 10-wheel drive for a truck with super-singles).

And for braking, just hook the motors up to resistance sinks.
 
Working at Honda, I am somewhat familiar in their system. If you are familiar with the VTEC system, it is based on the same principles. At the desired engine load, an oil pressure switch opens allowing oil pressure into the system. The rocker arms then "lock" forcing the outer rocker arms to follow the inner cam lobe which typically doesn't control anything.

Doing this, when that particular engine condition happens, the cams force the valves to open when they would be normally close so compression doesn't occur. Then they simply cut fuel.

As far as the other system, I imagine their systems are similar, but I can't give exact details.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top