Constructing Explicit Deformation Retractions

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Anonymous217
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Deformation Explicit
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 3K views
Anonymous217
Messages
355
Reaction score
2
I don't really know why, but I'm having trouble actually building deformation retractions, although I understand the concepts behind homotopies, etc.For example, when constructing a deformation retraction for [tex]\mathbb{R}^n-\{0\}[/tex] to [tex]S^{n-1}[/tex], I found that you could define the mapping [tex]F(x,t) = (\frac{x_1}{t||x||+(1-t)},...,\frac{x_n}{t||x||+(1-t)})[/tex]. However, I still don't see how you can think of such a thing..
I get the idea of turning the x_ns into unit vectors, but I don't understand the intuition behind the +(1-t), etc.
Anyone want to give some advice?
 
on Phys.org
I am not sure what you would like to know. Your mapping F(x,t) is such that F(x,0)=x, hence F(.,0)=id on R^n - {0} and F(x,1)=x/|x| is in the (n-1)-sphere. This is the reason the t's and (t-1)'s are put there as they are.
 
^ Never mind; I got my answer somewhere else. But what I meant was how someone comes up with such an idea. It's easy to see that the mapping is a det. ret., but it's harder to actually produce the mapping to begin with (or what I was having trouble on anyways).