Continuity, but is it limits or delta-epsilon or neighborhood?

  • Thread starter Thread starter filter54321
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Continuity Limits
filter54321
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
EDIT: My presentation of this was pretty bad so I'm trying again.

FIND ALL POINTS OF DISCONTINUITY (IF ANY)

f: {0}U{1/N} --> R
Where N is a natural number

Defined piecewise:
f(x) = 1/(x^2-x)
f(0)=f(1)=1

I'm scared of this problem. Obviously, the function blows up with asymptotes at x=0,1 so plugging the holes piecewise with f(0)=f(1)=1 doesn't help with continuity.

Last semester we covered limit-based continuity and delta-epsilon continuity. However, every single problem went from the real line to the real line. I don't see how you can do continuity with any of the three methods because of the discrete domain. The function doesn't have domain points to generate any of the range points that I want to be less than epsilon close.

The graph of the function is going to be scatter-shot across R2 where every point is floating on its own...I can only concluded that the function isn't continuous ANYWHERE. How do you tackle this one?

Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The definition of continuity hasn't changed for this smaller domain space; you just need to pay closer attention to the exact words.

Let A\subset\mathbb{R}. Then f: A \to \mathbb{R} is continuous at a \in A if, for every \varepsilon > 0, there exists \delta > 0 such that, whenever x \in A satisfies |x - a| < \delta, then |f(x) - f(a)| < \varepsilon.

To give an example: the function \iota: \mathbb{Q} \to \mathbb{R} defined by \iota(x) = x is continuous at every point of its domain \mathbb{Q}.

You cannot speak of a function being continuous or discontinuous at a point where it's not defined, so in your case, you only have to answer whether the points 0 and 1/n are points of continuity.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top