Continuity Equation in an Electromagnetic Field

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving the continuity equation for a charged particle in an electromagnetic field, utilizing the time-dependent Schrödinger equation and its complex conjugate. Participants are exploring the mathematical intricacies involved in this derivation.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants describe attempts to manipulate the Schrödinger equation to derive the continuity equation, noting specific steps taken and results obtained. Questions arise regarding the presence of a factor of 2 in the equations, with some participants suggesting that additional factors may be missing.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and suggestions for rewriting steps to clarify the derivation. Some guidance has been offered regarding the application of the product rule in the context of the equations, and there is an acknowledgment of the challenges faced in reaching the correct form of the continuity equation.

Contextual Notes

Participants express frustration over the derivation process and the specific factors involved, indicating a need for careful examination of the mathematical steps taken. The discussion reflects a collaborative effort to clarify the derivation without arriving at a definitive solution.

Rubiss
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Derive the continuity equation for a charged particle in an electromagnetic field

Homework Equations



The time-dependent Schrödinger equation and its complex conjugate are

i\hbar\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial t}=\frac{1}{2m}(-i\hbar \vec{\nabla} - \frac{e}{c} \vec{A})^{2}\psi+e\phi\psi

i\hbar\frac{\partial \psi^{*}}{\partial t}=\frac{1}{2m}(+i\hbar \vec{\nabla} - \frac{e}{c} \vec{A})^{2}\psi^{*}+e\phi\psi^{*}

The Attempt at a Solution



I proceed in much the same way I would when deriving the continuity equation without a magnetic field. I multiply the top equation by psi-star, the bottom by psi and subtract the bottom equation from the top equation to obtain

\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t} = \frac{-\hbar}{2mi}(\psi^{*}\vec{\nabla}^{2}\psi - \psi \vec{\nabla}^{2} \psi^{*})+\frac{e}{2mc}(2|\psi|^{2}\vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{A}+\psi^{*}\vec{A} \cdot \vec{\nabla}\psi + \psi \vec{A} \cdot \vec{\nabla}\psi^{*})

Now I pull a divergence out of the first quantity in the parentheses on the right, and that becomes the the probability current when there is no magnetic field. Then I use the fact that the divergence of A is zero. This leaves me with

\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t} = -\vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{j} + \frac{e}{2mc} (\psi^{*}\vec{A} \cdot \vec{\nabla}\psi + \psi \vec{A} \cdot \vec{\nabla}\psi^{*})

Now I pull the A out of parentheses:

\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t} = -\vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{j} + \frac{e}{2mc} \vec{A} \cdot (\psi^{*}\vec{\nabla}\psi + \psi\vec{\nabla}\psi^{*})

This becomes

\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t} = -\vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{j} + \frac{e}{2mc} \vec{A} \cdot (\vec{\nabla}|\psi|^{2})

and I can pull the gradient out because del dot A is zero:

\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t} = -\vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{j} + \frac{e}{2mc} \vec{\nabla} \cdot (\vec{A}|\psi|^{2})

Now pull the divergence out of both terms:

\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t} = -\vec{\nabla} \cdot (\vec{j} + \frac{e}{2mc}\vec{A}|\psi|^{2})

Now I am very close to the correct answer (I know because the result is on the page "probability current" on Wikipedia). My only problem is that there should NOT be a 2 in the denominator. I have spent a long time trying to find out why this 2 is there. Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Rubiss said:
The time-dependent Schrödinger equation and its complex conjugate are

i\hbar\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial t}=\frac{1}{2m}(-i\hbar \vec{\nabla} - \frac{e}{c} \vec{A})^{2}\psi+e\phi\psi

i\hbar\frac{\partial \psi^{*}}{\partial t}=\frac{1}{2m}(+i\hbar \vec{\nabla} - \frac{e}{c} \vec{A})^{2}\psi^{*}+e\phi\psi^{*}

I multiply the top equation by psi-star, the bottom by psi and subtract the bottom equation from the top equation to obtain

\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t} = \frac{-\hbar}{2mi}(\psi^{*}\vec{\nabla}^{2}\psi - \psi \vec{\nabla}^{2} \psi^{*})+\frac{e}{2mc}(2|\psi|^{2}\vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{A}+\psi^{*}\vec{A} \cdot \vec{\nabla}\psi + \psi \vec{A} \cdot \vec{\nabla}\psi^{*})

See if you can show that you are missing a couple of factors of 2 above. I think it should be

\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t} = \frac{-\hbar}{2mi}(\psi^{*}\vec{\nabla}^{2}\psi - \psi \vec{\nabla}^{2} \psi^{*})+\frac{e}{2mc}(2|\psi|^{2}\vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{A}+2\psi^{*}\vec{A} \cdot \vec{\nabla}\psi + 2\psi \vec{A} \cdot \vec{\nabla}\psi^{*})
 
TSny said:
See if you can show that you are missing a couple of factors of 2 above. I think it should be

\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t} = \frac{-\hbar}{2mi}(\psi^{*}\vec{\nabla}^{2}\psi - \psi \vec{\nabla}^{2} \psi^{*})+\frac{e}{2mc}(2|\psi|^{2}\vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{A}+2\psi^{*}\vec{A} \cdot \vec{\nabla}\psi + 2\psi \vec{A} \cdot \vec{\nabla}\psi^{*})

I think you're right, but I have rewritten my steps many times, and do not get that factor of 2 to show up. Very frustrating.
 
Rubiss said:
I think you're right, but I have rewritten my steps many times, and do not get that factor of 2 to show up. Very frustrating.

For

i\hbar\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial t}=\frac{1}{2m}(-i\hbar \vec{\nabla} - \frac{e}{c} \vec{A})^{2}\psi+e\phi\psi

try writing it as

i\hbar\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial t}=\frac{1}{2m}(-i\hbar \vec{\nabla} - \frac{e}{c} \vec{A})\cdot (-i\hbar \vec{\nabla} - \frac{e}{c} \vec{A})\psi+e\phi\psi

First write out ##(-i\hbar \vec{\nabla} - \frac{e}{c} \vec{A})\psi## and then operate on the result with the other ##(-i\hbar \vec{\nabla} - \frac{e}{c} \vec{A})##. If you encounter ##\vec{\nabla}\cdot(\vec{A}\psi)## then remember that ##\vec{\nabla}## operates on both ##\vec{A}## and ##\psi## according to the product rule.
 
TSny said:
For

i\hbar\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial t}=\frac{1}{2m}(-i\hbar \vec{\nabla} - \frac{e}{c} \vec{A})^{2}\psi+e\phi\psi

try writing it as

i\hbar\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial t}=\frac{1}{2m}(-i\hbar \vec{\nabla} - \frac{e}{c} \vec{A})\cdot (-i\hbar \vec{\nabla} - \frac{e}{c} \vec{A})\psi+e\phi\psi

First write out ##(-i\hbar \vec{\nabla} - \frac{e}{c} \vec{A})\psi## and then operate on the result with the other ##(-i\hbar \vec{\nabla} - \frac{e}{c} \vec{A})##. If you encounter ##\vec{\nabla}\cdot(\vec{A}\psi)## then remember that ##\vec{\nabla}## operates on both ##\vec{A}## and ##\psi## according to the product rule.


Ah, yes! That is the crucial part I was missing - del acts on both psi and A.

Thanks so much!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K