Hi.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

In the book i'm reading it gives the function

f(x) = 0, if x is irrational

f(x) = 1/q, if x=p/q in lowest terms.

It says this is continuous at all irrational x. This i can understand i think, because you can show that f(x) tends to zero, as x tends to a, for all a. For this you just take epsilon to be the distance from a to the closest rational number. It can be seen from the graph:

http://img80.imageshack.us/img80/7246/26351357js6.jpg [Broken]

Then they give the function

f(x) = 0, if x is irrational

f(x) = x, if x is rational.

But they say this is discontinuous at all values of x other than x=0. I don't really understand why this is the case. How come you can't use the same argument as above to show that f(x) tends to zero, as x tends to a, for all a again?

Thanks!

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Continuity question

Loading...

Similar Threads - Continuity question | Date |
---|---|

A very basic question about continuous function | Jan 18, 2012 |

General question about continuity (2 var.) | Nov 15, 2011 |

Hopefully easy question about sups of continuous functions | Mar 22, 2011 |

Set theory/continuity question | Dec 17, 2010 |

Quick Question about Continuity | Sep 14, 2009 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**