Continuous Compounding Interest

ecoo
Messages
86
Reaction score
2
Hello

So from what I understand, the continuous compound formula finds out the most you can get from interest no matter how many times you compound the interest in a set amount of time. So how come when I plugin in a big number into the regular compounding formula for the rate, the end amount is more than the amount I get when calculating with the continuous compounding formula? I think that it's a calculator inaccuracy, or is my view incorrect?

Thanks for the help!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
ecoo said:
Hello

So from what I understand, the continuous compound formula finds out the most you can get from interest no matter how many times you compound the interest in a set amount of time. So how come when I plugin in a big number into the regular compounding formula for the rate, the end amount is more than the amount I get when calculating with the continuous compounding formula? I think that it's a calculator inaccuracy, or is my view incorrect?

Thanks for the help!
Interest compounded continuously should give the larger amount. Can you show us an example where the normal compounding formula seems to give a larger interest amount?

Are you forgetting to divide the annual interest rate by the number of compounding periods per year?
 
Mark44 said:
Interest compounded continuously should give the larger amount. Can you show us an example where the normal compounding formula seems to give a larger interest amount?

Are you forgetting to divide the annual interest rate by the number of compounding periods per year?
So for example, if I use the regular compounding interest for 6% for 10 years, and the rate is 999999999999 (add more if you want), then the answer is more than the continuous equation result. Besides the answer, is my thinking correct?
 
Noncontinuous: A_{noncont}=P(1+\frac{0.06}{999999999999})^{10\times999999999999}=1.82124518238P
Continuous: A_{cont}=Pe^{(0.06\times10)}=1.82211880039P
A_{noncont}<A_{cont}
 
ecoo said:
So for example, if I use the regular compounding interest for 6% for 10 years, and the rate is 999999999999 (add more if you want), then the answer is more than the continuous equation result. Besides the answer, is my thinking correct?
The rate refers to the interest rate, which in your example is 6%. The periodic interest rate would be .06/999999999999.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top