MHB Continuous Compounding over 12 months (finding the rate)

  • Thread starter Thread starter tomadom
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Continuous Rate
AI Thread Summary
To find the continuous compounding rate for an initial value of 20 growing to 33 over 12 periods, the formula A = Pe^(rt) is used. By substituting the known values, the equation simplifies to 33 = 20e^(12r). Solving for r gives approximately 0.04173, indicating a monthly compounding rate of about 4.17%. This allows for the calculation of values at each period, resulting in a table of amounts from 20 at period 0 to 33 at period 12. The discussion effectively clarifies the application of the continuous compounding formula and provides a structured way to chart the growth.
tomadom
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
This problem is actually for a program I'm writing and I've forgotten my basic maths.I have an initial value starting at period 0 . That value is 20.
At the end of 12 periods (period 12) I have a value of 33.

So I know the last value is 33 and the first value is 20 and I want to find the
continuous compounding rate so that I can apply it at any of the periods 1 to 11 and chart the output. I need to find r.

I know the formula is A = Pe^rt but I get stuck.

33 = 20*e^r at the 12 period, but if it's continuously compounded then I'm not sure what to do with t because:

log(33/20) = r gives me the total amount of interest accumed for that 12 months (21.75%) I think. So I divide that rate by 12 = 1.81% for each month on top of the previous month. But by the time that 12th month is reached I'm at 66.15 not 33.

So conceptually I'm getting mixed up somewhere? Could someone show me?..
Thanks

0 - 20
1 - ?
2 - ?
3 - ?
4 - ?
5 - ?
6 - ?
7 - ?
8 - ?
9 - ?
10 - ?
11 - ?
12 - 33
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Your formula is correct:

$$A=Pe^{rt}$$

Plug in known values:

$$33=20e^{12r}$$

Solve for $r$:

$$r=\frac{1}{12}\ln\left(\frac{33}{20}\right)\approx0.04173127399270744$$

Thus, we find:

$$A(t)=20\left(\frac{33}{20}\right)^{\frac{t}{12}}$$

Now we can fill in the table (rounded to the nearest penny):

[table="width: 300, class: grid"]
[tr]
[td]
Month
[/td]
[td]
Amount
[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]0[/td]
[td]\$20.00[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]1[/td]
[td]\$20.85[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]2[/td]
[td]\$21.74[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]3[/td]
[td]\$22.67[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]4[/td]
[td]\$23.63[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]5[/td]
[td]\$24.64[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]6[/td]
[td]\$25.69[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]7[/td]
[td]\$26.79[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]8[/td]
[td]\$27.93[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]9[/td]
[td]\$29.12[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]10[/td]
[td]\$30.36[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]11[/td]
[td]\$31.65[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]12[/td]
[td]\$33.00[/td]
[/tr]
[/table]
 
Thanks very much for that.. Very neat explanation.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top