Continuous-time processes with attraction?

  • Thread starter Thread starter CRGreathouse
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Attraction
CRGreathouse
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
2,832
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to find a good model, and I wanted to find a process that fits. The Poisson process almost fits, but unfortunately the independence assumption is too strong for my data. Is there a similar process that has a parameter (or several) that allow for points to attract or repel others, like zeta zeros?

I've never been good with statistics, so there could be a very simple process I've overlooked, I don't know.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
CRGreathouse said:
I'm trying to find a good model, and I wanted to find a process that fits. The Poisson process almost fits, but unfortunately the independence assumption is too strong for my data. Is there a similar process that has a parameter (or several) that allow for points to attract or repel others, like zeta zeros?

I've never been good with statistics, so there could be a very simple process I've overlooked, I don't know.

Negative binomial distribution?
The distribution is described by 2 parameters.
One could be considered a "dispersion" parameter;
a degree of "clumping" in the population?
Maybe it could provide a knob for dialing up or down the degree of attraction or repulsion.
 
fopc said:
Negative binomial distribution?
The distribution is described by 2 parameters.
One could be considered a "dispersion" parameter;
a degree of "clumping" in the population?
Maybe it could provide a knob for dialing up or down the degree of attraction or repulsion.

Oh, cool. This looks good -- I'll have to try it with my population to see how well it can model it.

Thanks!
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top