Contour Integration: Evaluating Integral on Unit Circle

  • Thread starter Thread starter bwinter
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating the integral \(\int_{0}^{2\pi} \frac{d\theta}{1+\epsilon \cos\theta}\) using contour integration techniques, specifically on the unit circle. Participants are exploring the implications of substituting \(z = e^{i\theta}\) and expressing \(\cos\theta\) in terms of \(z\), while considering the conditions \(|\epsilon| < 1\).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the transformation of the integral into the complex plane and the necessary substitution for \(d\theta\). There is uncertainty regarding the presence of poles and how to handle them in the context of contour integration.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants sharing their attempts to rewrite the integral and clarify the nature of the poles. Some have identified potential poles and are debating their locations relative to the unit circle, while others are questioning the correctness of their algebraic manipulations.

Contextual Notes

There is confusion regarding the identification of poles and their relevance to the integral, particularly concerning the behavior of the function at \(z=0\) and the implications of the roots derived from the denominator. Participants are navigating through the algebraic details and the requirements of contour integration.

bwinter
Messages
27
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Evaluate \int_{0}^{2\pi} \frac{d\theta}{1+\epsilon cos\theta}

where \left|\epsilon\right|&lt;1, by letting z=e^{i\theta} and cos\theta = (z+z^{-1})/2 and choosing contour \left|z\right| = 1, a unit circle.

Homework Equations


I know this has something to do with contour integration, but there are no poles as far as I'm aware and I'm used to going from dz to d\theta that I'm a bit confused here as to what to do.

The Attempt at a Solution


I've gotten as far as subbing in the relevant replacement, but I'm lost otherwise. Residues don't apply here, right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you show us what you got after you rewrote the integral in terms of z?
 
I'm not sure how to do that either. I just replaced the cosine with what's written. Not sure how dtheta changes into dz.
 
You do it like you normally do. You start with z=e^{i\theta} and differentiate to get dz=ie^{i\theta}\,d\theta=iz\,d\theta.
 
Oh, ok I think I got this. Just needed a push in the right direction. If I do that I get a quadratic in the denominator which results in two poles, then I can choose one and integrate around it which results in a residue which gives the answer. Sounds right?
 
You can't just choose one and integrate around it. You're integrating along the unit circle |z|=1. Therefore you must take the pole that lies within this circle.
 
I've found that the poles exist at z=\frac{-1\pm\sqrt{1-\epsilon^2}}{\epsilon} which don't fall inside the circle. Does this imply there are no poles I have to be concerned about? I'm super confused what I'm supposed to be doing here.
 
Last edited:
I haven't checked your entire solution, but it seems you missed the 'obvious' z=0 pole.
 
Your roots aren't correct. I think you made an algebra mistake somewhere. What did you get in the denominator? I got \epsilon z^2+2z+\epsilon.
 
  • #10
Cyosis said:
I haven't checked your entire solution, but it seems you missed the 'obvious' z=0 pole.
That's actually not a pole here, I don't think. Plugging in z=0 gives me \epsilon in the denominator.

vela said:
Your roots aren't correct. I think you made an algebra mistake somewhere. What did you get in the denominator? I got \epsilon z^2+2z+\epsilon.

Yep, that's what I got after I factored out the 2/i, in which case my roots are correct, as I double-checked them with Wolfram.
edit: Actually one of my roots does fall inside the circle after all. Do I find a residue for that pole?
 
Last edited:
  • #11
OK, I see you fixed the expression for the roots in your earlier post. I wasn't sure if you got the wrong roots or just entered the wrong LaTeX. In any case, our roots agree now.

So, yeah, as you found, one pole is inside the contour. The contour integral will equal 2πi times the residue at that pole, so you want to find it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K