Dixanadu
- 250
- 2
Hey guys,
So in my notes I've got this statement written:
If tensor with no symmetry properties, A^{\mu\nu}, contracts to a_{\mu\nu}, we can write this as A^{\mu\nu}a_{\mu\nu}=\frac{1}{2}a_{\mu\nu}(A^{\mu\nu}-A^{\nu\mu}) as a_{\mu\nu} (A^{\mu\nu}+A^{\nu\mu}) = 0. So I don't see how the symmetric part contracts to 0.
*Note* I do also have written that a^{\mu\nu}=-a^{\nu\mu} but I am not sure if this is relevant.
I understand that you can decompose the tensor A^{\mu\nu} into the sum of symmetric and anti-symmetric parts, but i don't see why the symmetric part vanishes under contraction.
If someone could explain I'd be very grateful - thank you!
So in my notes I've got this statement written:
If tensor with no symmetry properties, A^{\mu\nu}, contracts to a_{\mu\nu}, we can write this as A^{\mu\nu}a_{\mu\nu}=\frac{1}{2}a_{\mu\nu}(A^{\mu\nu}-A^{\nu\mu}) as a_{\mu\nu} (A^{\mu\nu}+A^{\nu\mu}) = 0. So I don't see how the symmetric part contracts to 0.
*Note* I do also have written that a^{\mu\nu}=-a^{\nu\mu} but I am not sure if this is relevant.
I understand that you can decompose the tensor A^{\mu\nu} into the sum of symmetric and anti-symmetric parts, but i don't see why the symmetric part vanishes under contraction.
If someone could explain I'd be very grateful - thank you!
Last edited: