What Are Contravariant and Covariant Tensors in Relativity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter yukcream
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Covariant
yukcream
Messages
59
Reaction score
0
Can anyone explain to me what is contravariant and covariant? I just know that they are tensors with specific transformation properties (from website of MathWorld), i also know that the relation between two is the -ve sign.
Then dose it mean that:
given a 4-velocity of a particle is the vector
u' = dx^i/ds then how about the covariant of u'?

furthermore

given u' = { 1/sqrt (1-V^2/C^2) , v/c sqrt (1-V^2/ C^2) , then I wnat to ask am I right that the covaritant of u is { -1/sqrt (1-V^2/C^2) , -v/c sqrt (1-V^2/ C^2)?

if yes i can't get the relation u'u_' =1 (u_' indicate a subscripts)

yukyuk
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One property that is easy to spot is that contravariant tensors are like vectors, little arrows in the tangent space you know, while covariant tensors are like differential operators. Indeed I think it is true that all the classical covariant tensors, except the metric itself, come from differntial operations, especially covariant differentiation. Because the Riemann-Christoffel or curvature tensor can be constructed as the difference between the second covariant derivatives of an arbitrary contravariant vector with opposite orders of differentiation, and the Ricci and Einstein tensors derive their contravariant components from R-C.
 
yukcream said:
Can anyone explain to me what is contravariant and covariant? I just know that they are tensors with specific transformation properties (from website of MathWorld), i also know that the relation between two is the -ve sign.
Then dose it mean that:
given a 4-velocity of a particle is the vector
u' = dx^i/ds then how about the covariant of u'?

furthermore

given u' = { 1/sqrt (1-V^2/C^2) , v/c sqrt (1-V^2/ C^2) , then I wnat to ask am I right that the covaritant of u is { -1/sqrt (1-V^2/C^2) , -v/c sqrt (1-V^2/ C^2)?

if yes i can't get the relation u'u_' =1 (u_' indicate a subscripts)

yukyuk

While the specific answer depends on your metric, this looks wrong.

On a practical level, in relativity you lower the index of your tensor with the metric, g_ab.

This means that given a vector u^a = (a,b), the contravariant vector is

(g_00*a + g_01*b, g_10*a + g_11*b)

The dot product of u^a u_a, the covariant and contravariant vectors, is supposed to give the "length" of the vector. In relativity, the vectors are generally 4-vectors, and the "length" of the vector is its invariant Lorentz interval. Your vector is a bit odd, having only 2 components - I'm assuming that one of them is probably time, and the other is probably some spatial dimension.

Your result would only work with a metric of
-1 0
0 -1

which is unlikely. A much more likely candidate would be either
-1 0
0 1

OR

1 0
0 -1

(both sorts of sign convention are used). This would be for a flat "Minkowski" space-time.


Because this is posted in the relativity forum, and not the math forum, I'm assuming you are asking about covariant and contravariant vectors in relativity. In other applications, the vectors could be 3-vectors, and the "length" the usual length.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
Back
Top