Controlled Descent of Amateur Rocket: Ideas Needed

  • Thread starter Thread starter Shawnzyoo
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on developing a controlled descent system for an amateur rocket intended to reach 4000 feet. Participants suggest various methods, including using a radio-controlled glider as a payload or employing a semi-passive system with aerodynamic features. Concerns are raised about the challenges of using parachutes for controlled descent, with recommendations leaning towards deploying a large balloon for stability and small control fans for navigation. The project is acknowledged as complex, requiring significant modifications to standard model rockets and possibly a larger, certified design. Overall, the feasibility of achieving precise landing control remains a significant challenge.
Shawnzyoo
Messages
104
Reaction score
0
I am going to start working on the controlled descent of an amatuer rocket
I want to go up to about 4000ft and then be able to have a controlled descent to a specific location.
I am still very very early in the process and just brainstorming ideas about GPS locators and what not.
has anyone ever done such a project? or have any suggestions
all suggestions are welcome
thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Controlled descent how? Like some type of radio controlled vehicle you can glide back down to a specific landing area :cool:
 
possibly a radio controlled device
or a semi passive system.
 
How about just using a very aerodynamic r/c glider as your payload or final stage. If necessary, spring load the wings so they don't deploy until the ejection charge fires. If you use sheathed cables instead of control rods for the aelerons and elevators, that shouldn't be a problem.
 
if you have a rocket comming down with a parachue you will have zero control with it. the only thing you could do is use a parafoil and connect servos and use an autopilot, but that's going to be wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy too hard to do within even one years time. The glider idea is your best bet, or shoot the rocket at specific tajectories so you know where it will crash, and somehow deploy the parachute when your near impact, so you can slow down and hit the ground there. I don't take it you design autopilots or you wouldent have asked, your best bet is manually trying to control it somehow, but again, real 'iffy' if you use a standard rocket. Its got to be fairly big to carry servos, and now your no longer using a $20 estes model rocket, you need a big one and a certification and a lisence. Sorry to sound negative, but its a daunting task.
 
it will be a 7inch diameter tube, with a high powered motor approximately J350
(350 N of thrust)
yeah i pretty much gave up the idea of using actual parachutes
what I am thinking is deploying a large balloon that is anchored to the body in a couple of spots for rigidity
and using really small control fans to navigate it as its coming down
 
How did you find PF?: Via Google search Hi, I have a vessel I 3D printed to investigate single bubble rise. The vessel has a 4 mm gap separated by acrylic panels. This is essentially my viewing chamber where I can record the bubble motion. The vessel is open to atmosphere. The bubble generation mechanism is composed of a syringe pump and glass capillary tube (Internal Diameter of 0.45 mm). I connect a 1/4” air line hose from the syringe to the capillary The bubble is formed at the tip...
Thread 'What type of toilet do I have?'
I was enrolled in an online plumbing course at Stratford University. My plumbing textbook lists four types of residential toilets: 1# upflush toilets 2# pressure assisted toilets 3# gravity-fed, rim jet toilets and 4# gravity-fed, siphon-jet toilets. I know my toilet is not an upflush toilet because my toilet is not below the sewage line, and my toilet does not have a grinder and a pump next to it to propel waste upwards. I am about 99% sure that my toilet is not a pressure assisted...
After over 25 years of engineering, designing and analyzing bolted joints, I just learned this little fact. According to ASME B1.2, Gages and Gaging for Unified Inch Screw Threads: "The no-go gage should not pass over more than three complete turns when inserted into the internal thread of the product. " 3 turns seems like way to much. I have some really critical nuts that are of standard geometry (5/8"-11 UNC 3B) and have about 4.5 threads when you account for the chamfers on either...
Back
Top