Controlling LED with Transistor

  • Thread starter Thread starter cepheid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Led Transistor
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a circuit design for controlling an LED with a transistor, where the LED is off when the voltage at point "A" is high and on when it is low or floating. Key considerations include ensuring the LED's forward voltage is higher than the BJT's saturation voltage and selecting an appropriate base resistor to achieve transistor saturation. The user measured a forward voltage of approximately 1.8V for the LED and noted that the collector voltage drops to 0.2V when conducting, indicating saturation is occurring. There is a concern about power consumption when the LED is off, suggesting a potential redesign to minimize power usage in that state. Overall, the circuit appears to function correctly, but optimization for power efficiency is recommended.
cepheid
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
5,197
Reaction score
38
I want to implement the following very simple logic:

Voltage at point "A" is high ==> LED is OFF

Voltage at point "A" is low or floating ==> LED is ON

and I came up with the attached circuit to implement it. I'm just wondering if there is anything "bad" about doing it this way, or if this circuit is OK.
 

Attachments

  • led_npn.png
    led_npn.png
    3.2 KB · Views: 537
Engineering news on Phys.org
You should be okay with this basic inverter, assuming:
1) The LED forward voltage is higher than the BJT's saturation voltage V_{CE(SAT)}, and lower than V_{CC}, and
2) The base resistor is selected such that the BJT actually saturates
 
MATLABdude said:
You should be okay with this basic inverter, assuming:
1) The LED forward voltage is higher than the BJT's saturation voltage V_{CE(SAT)}, and lower than V_{CC},

Okay, well I have measured a fairly large forward voltage for this LED, ~ 1.8 V, whereas it appears that the collector is pulled down to 0.2 V when conducting (I assume that this is the saturation voltage). My Vcc is 6.0 V, since I'm using 4 AA batteries.

MATLABdude said:
and
2) The base resistor is selected such that the BJT actually saturates

My understanding of what saturation is is that the base current is large enough that the expected collector current IC = βIB, is so large that it cannot possibly be achieved by a voltage drop across the collector resistor. The required voltage drop would mean pulling the collector below ground, which the transistor cannot do. Instead the collector just gets pulled down to some small voltage value that is almost 0 -- the saturation voltage. It seems like with a choice of base resistor of 1k or 10k, saturation is happening easily. Am I understanding things correctly?
 
Things sound like they're all right. When I learned of saturation, it was "starving the collector", but it could just as easily be "stuffing the base", depending on your context and what you have available. When you design for saturation, you get to choose the value for beta, such that \beta_{SAT} < \beta_{\circ}
 
http://profmason.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/LogicProbe.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There is one-thing 'stupid' of the circuit. It will consume more power when the led is OFF.
If you wanted to have no power consumed when the led is off Pherhaps you could do so in this way. I have guessed some values.
modi.jpg
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top