Conundrums on energy and graphs

  • Thread starter Thread starter aspodkfpo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Graphs
AI Thread Summary
Kinetic energy (KE) is always positive due to its formula, KE = 1/2 mv^2, which results in positive values regardless of the direction of velocity. When an object's velocity changes direction, the initial and final KE remain equal, leading to a change in KE of zero; however, work done (W) can be negative if the force acts against the direction of motion. Work is defined as W = fdcos(theta), where force (F) and distance (d) are magnitudes, and work is a scalar quantity that can be positive or negative. Scalars represent values without direction and can have positive or negative signs, while magnitudes are always non-negative. The discussion emphasizes that while KE is always positive, potential energy can be both positive and negative, and differentiating at points of change in a velocity-time graph is not possible due to the nature of acceleration changes.
aspodkfpo
Messages
148
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
Multiple questions that I have regarding concepts.
Relevant Equations
KE=1/2mv^2, W=fdcos(theta), W=fs
1. I wanted to clarify if Kinetic energy is always positive. Since KE = 1/2 mv^2, and m and the square of v is positive. I assume as such.

2. Given that I have a scenario where an object which was traveling at a positive velocity in a certain direction (we take this direction as positive), reverses the direction and travels at a negative velocity similar in magnitude. The KE final and initial would be equal due to KE always being positive. Now, the change in KE would be 0, since both values are equal positive values. However, that is not the case as W = fdcos(theta). And clearly, there must be a force enacted to change the velocity of the object. Assume there is a distance present over which the force acts. Now, the work should be negative as cos(theta) is negative.

Given this, I don't understand what I am supposed to do when writing KE or W. If KE is negative relative to something else, would I write KE = - 1/2 mv^2?

3. W=fdcos(theta) or W=Fs. In the cos theta version, are f and d magnitude/s, vector/s or scalar/s? In the w=fs version, I have the same question.

4. I read somewhere that scalars are simply values. In that case, are scalars magnitudes with signs, rather than just magnitudes? Or is a magnitude being an absolute value a misconception?

5. Say that I have a velocity time graph, and the velocity changes at a certain point. These points of change can not be differentiated can they? Would the end point's slope be undefined as well?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes kinetic energy is always positive and it is a scalar quantity. Work is also a scalar, and can be negative or positive. You can’t differentiate at a discontinuity in the curve, but in actuality, it is not really a discontinuity because you can’t have an instantaneous change in acceleration, so rather, that point is actually a short curve as the acceleration changes to its new value in a small finite period of time and distance.
Oh you are new here so welcome to PF!
 
PhanthomJay said:
Yes kinetic energy is always positive and it is a scalar quantity. Work is also a scalar, and can be negative or positive. You can’t differentiate at a discontinuity in the curve, but in actuality, it is not really a discontinuity because you can’t have an instantaneous change in acceleration, so rather, that point is actually a short curve as the acceleration changes to its new value in a small finite period of time and distance.
Oh you are new here so welcome to PF!

What about question 3 and question 4? I've figured out my problem in q2.
 
3. W=fdcos(theta) or W=Fs. In the cos theta version, are f and d magnitude/s, vector/s or scalar/s? In the w=fs version, I have the same question.
In the first, F and d are the magnitudes of the vectors F and d, respectively, and work is a scalar.in the second, it is W = F.s, the dot product of 2 vectors, which is fscostheta, the same result.
4. I read somewhere that scalars are simply values. In that case, are scalars magnitudes with signs, rather than just magnitudes? Or is a magnitude being an absolute value a misconception?
scalars do not have direction. They can be plus or minus, but the plus or minus signs do not indicate direction. Like temperature is a scalar and it can be above or below 0 degrees C. The confusion may be in the use of the word ‘magnitude’. The magnitude of a vector is it’s absolute value and is a positive number, but the magnitude of a scalar can be positive or negative. Kinetic energy is a scalar always positive because of the squared term, but potential energy is also a scalar which can be positive or negative.
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban
aspodkfpo said:
2. Given that I have a scenario where an object which was traveling at a positive velocity in a certain direction (we take this direction as positive), reverses the direction and travels at a negative velocity similar in magnitude. The KE final and initial would be equal due to KE always being positive. Now, the change in KE would be 0, since both values are equal positive values. However, that is not the case as W = fdcos(theta). And clearly, there must be a force enacted to change the velocity of the object. Assume there is a distance present over which the force acts. Now, the work should be negative as cos(theta) is negative.

You could think about an object moving in one direction, impacting a spring, compressing the spring until it stops, then being accelerated by the spring back in the opposite direction.

This system starts and ends with the same energy, all the KE of the moving object. The total work done by the spring on the object is zero. Can you see why?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban and PhanthomJay
aspodkfpo said:
4. I read somewhere that scalars are simply values. In that case, are scalars magnitudes with signs, rather than just magnitudes? Or is a magnitude being an absolute value a misconception?
If you ever get to the point of studying linear algebra, the notions of vectors and of scalars are given a much more formal footing.

Quoting from the article linked above:

"A vector space (also called a linear space) is a collection of objects called vectors, which may be added together and multiplied ("scaled") by numbers, called scalars."

For now (until you get to vector spaces without norms or scalars that are not real numbers):

Scalars can be negative. Magnitudes are always positive (or zero).
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top