Convergence of a series based on reciprocals of prime factors of 2 & 3

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the convergence of a series composed of reciprocals of positive integers with only 2 and 3 as prime factors. The series can be expressed as a sum of subseries categorized by the number of 2s and 3s in the denominators. Each subseries is treated as a geometric series, leading to the conclusion that the total sum of the series is 4. The method involves grouping terms and applying geometric series formulas to find the overall convergence. Ultimately, the series converges, demonstrating a structured approach to analyzing infinite series.
Kenshin
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
i don't even know where to start and i hate series. if someone could get me stared that would be great help. thanks

The terms of this series are reciprocals of positive integers whose only prime factors are 2s and 3s:

1+1/2+1/3+1/4+1/6+1/8+1/9+1/12+...

Show that this series converges and find its sum.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think of the infinite series as a sum of the folllowing subseries:
1. The subseries lacking "2" as a factor
2. The subseries with "2" as a single factor.
3. The subseries with 2 as a double factor (i.e, 2^2)
And so on..
We have the following sums:
1: 3/2
2: 1/2*3/2
3:1/4*3/2
and so on.
Hence, the total sum is 3.

Note that your infinite series is simply the Cauchy-product:
\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{2^{n}}\sum_{m=0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{3^{m}}

End note:
Don't double post.
 
Last edited:


To start, we can rewrite the series as:

1 + 1/2 + 1/3 + (1/2)(1/2) + (1/2)(1/3) + (1/3)(1/2) + (1/2)(1/2)(1/2) + (1/2)(1/2)(1/3) + (1/3)(1/2)(1/2) + (1/3)(1/3) + ...

We can see that the terms can be grouped into subsets based on the number of 2s and 3s in the denominator. For example, the first subset contains terms with no 2s or 3s in the denominator (1), the second subset contains terms with one 2 in the denominator (1/2, 1/3), the third subset contains terms with two 2s in the denominator (1/4, 1/6, 1/8), and so on.

Now, we can rewrite each subset as a geometric series and find its sum. For the first subset, the sum is simply 1. For the second subset, the sum is 1/2 + 1/3 = 1/2 + 1/2 = 1. For the third subset, the sum is 1/4 + 1/6 + 1/8 = 1/4 + 1/4 = 1/2. And so on.

Therefore, the sum of the entire series is the sum of all the subsets, which is 1 + 1 + 1/2 + 1/2 + 1/2 + ... = 2 + 1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8 + ...

This is a geometric series with a common ratio of 1/2 and the sum can be found using the formula S = a/(1-r), where a is the first term and r is the common ratio. So, the sum is 2/(1-1/2) = 4.

Thus, the series converges to a sum of 4.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top