Convergence of a Series with the Ratio Test

  • Thread starter Thread starter Alem2000
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Series
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on applying the ratio test to determine the convergence of the series ∑(n=3 to ∞) (x^n)/(n3^n). The limit derived from the ratio test is |x|/3, which indicates convergence when |x| < 3 and divergence when |x| > 3, with inconclusive results at |x| = 3. For x = 3, the series behaves like the harmonic series and diverges. For x = -3, the series is alternating, allowing the use of the Leibniz test for further analysis. The key takeaway is the need to evaluate the series at the boundary points to ascertain convergence or divergence.
Alem2000
Messages
117
Reaction score
0
Sorry about the title everyone but I've posted numerous threads on series and I had to choose an apropriate title :-p
The problem asks to use the ratio test, and determine for which values of x the test is conclusive-either converging or diverging. Then check those cases where the test is inconclusive by some other means.

here is the the series \sum_{n=3}^{\infty}\frac{x^n}{n3^n}...converge or diverge here is what i did \frac{a_{n+1}}{a_n} and that came out to be \frac{x^{n+1}}{(n+1)(3^{n+1})} multiplie by the \frac{n3^{n}}{x^{n}} and after you cross out similar variables and it comes out to be

\lim_{x\rightarrow \infty}\frac{xn}{3(n+1)}
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
\frac{a_{n+1}}{a_n}=\frac{x^{n+1}n3^n}{x^n(n+1)3^{n+1}}=\frac{nx}{(n+1)3}
 
thanks galileo but I got that far just had problems latexing it
 
So you get

\lim_{n \to \infty} \left| \frac{n}{(n+1)}\frac{x}{3}\right| = \frac{|x|}{3}

And you know this is stricly less than 1 for it to be conclusively converging, strictly greater than 1 to be conclusively diverging, and inconclusive at 1. So you must test the values for which the expression equals one.

--J
 
The remaining cases are x=3 and x=-3

If x=3 then the series reduces to the harmonic series, which diverges.

If x=-3 then we have an alternating series, and we can use the Leibnitz test (whose exact conditions escape me right now).
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top