I Convergence of an alternating series

Happiness
Messages
686
Reaction score
30
Consider a sequence with the ##n^{th}## term ##u_n##. Let ##S_{2m}## be the sum of the ##2m## terms starting from ##u_N## for some ##N\geq1##.

If ##\lim_{N\rightarrow\infty}S_{2m}=0## for all ##m##, then the series converges. Why?

This is not explained in the following proof:
Screen Shot 2016-06-11 at 1.20.39 am.png

Screen Shot 2016-06-11 at 1.20.51 am.png
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Happiness said:
Consider a sequence with the ##n^{th}## term ##u_n##. Let ##S_{2m}## be the sum of the ##2m## terms starting from ##u_N## for some ##N\geq1##.

If ##\lim_{N\rightarrow\infty}S_{2m}=0## for all ##m##, then the series converges. Why?
This is not true, consider ##u_n=(-1)^n##. You also have to add that un are alternating and decreasing in magnitude.

The proof looks a bit sloppy, but you can use a similar approach to show that the partial sum is always between two numbers that approach the same limit. Sandwich theorem.
 
  • Like
Likes Happiness
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top