Conversion of particle fluence to Krad

  • Thread starter Thread starter lekshmi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Particle
lekshmi
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
suppose in a radiation environment , the radiation dosage is given in terms of no: of particles per square centimeter, how will we convert it in terms of rad or kilorad or gray?
For eg: let the proton fluence be 6.2 X 10^11 /cm^2. the energy is 50 MeV. how can we express it in terms of Krad?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I thought those doses where [energy absorbed per kilogram of matter]

e.g 1 Gray = 1J/1kg matter

So one has to make assumptions on what is happening to that radiation fluence, assuming that it impinges on water and that it is fully absorbed or whatever.
 
actually i am dealing with the radiation effects of certain materials like InGaAs pin photodetector. in 1 square centimeter of that material proton fluence of 6X10^11 particles are falling.i want to get the dosage in terms of Krad or gray. In one paper it was given that 6.2 X 10 ^11 protons/ cm^2 of energy 50 MeV corresponds to 100 krad.
similarly 2 MeV electrons of fluence 4.1 X10^12 corresponds to 100 Krad.
and 100 MeV electrons of fluence 3.3 X 10^12 also corresponds to 100 krad.
how can i relate all these figures?
 
what paper? a paper related to that particular detector?

6.2 X 10 ^11 protons/ cm^2 of energy 50 MeV is 5 Joules/cm^2

I mean, the dosage is measured in energy per mass, and it is material dependent.
 
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top