MHB Convert another equation x^2+y^2=4 to polar form

AI Thread Summary
The equation x^2 + y^2 = 4 represents a circle centered at the origin with a radius of 2. To convert it to polar form, substitute x and y with their polar equivalents: x = r cos(θ) and y = r sin(θ). This leads to the equation r^2 cos^2(θ) + r^2 sin^2(θ) = 4, which simplifies using the Pythagorean identity to r^2 = 4. Therefore, the polar form of the equation is r = 2.
Elissa89
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
x^2+y^2=4

I have so far:

(r^2)cos^(theta)+(r^2)sin(theta)=4

Idk what I'm supposed to do from here
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You need to also square the trig. functions:

$$x^2+y^2=4$$

$$(r\cos(\theta))^2+(r\sin(\theta))^2=4$$

$$r^2\cos^2(\theta)+r^2\sin^2(\theta)=4$$

Factor the LHS...what do you have...is there a trig. identity you can apply?
 
MarkFL said:
You need to also square the trig. functions:

$$x^2+y^2=4$$

$$(r\cos(\theta))^2+(r\sin(\theta))^2=4$$

$$r^2\cos^2(\theta)+r^2\sin^2(\theta)=4$$

Factor the LHS...what do you have...is there a trig. identity you can apply?

got it! thanks!
 
Elissa89 said:
got it! thanks!

We see we have a circle centered at the origin, and in polar coordinates, that's simply a constant value for \(r\). The Cartesian equation:

$$x^2+y^2=a^2$$ where \(0<a\)

Has the polar equation:

$$r=a$$
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top