Convert between sinusoidal / phasor, find average power, impedance

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around converting sinusoidal voltage and current expressions to phasor form, calculating average power in an electrical circuit, and understanding impedance in the context of AC circuits. Participants explore various equations and methods related to these concepts, including the use of complex numbers and phasors.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a homework problem involving a sinusoidal voltage and seeks to find average power and current in the circuit.
  • Another participant suggests using a scientific calculator to simplify calculations.
  • There is a discussion on converting the cosine function to sine form and then to phasor form, with some participants providing different methods for conversion.
  • Some participants argue about whether to use maximum values or RMS values for voltage and current in the average power formula.
  • One participant expresses confusion about the relationship between impedance and time, stating that impedance should be treated as a constant.
  • There is a debate about the correct representation of phasors and the significance of angles in the context of average power calculations.
  • Participants discuss the importance of the power factor and its relationship to the angle between voltage and current phasors.
  • Some participants question the lack of information to calculate the power factor and the implications of using different angles in calculations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on several points, including the use of maximum versus RMS values, the treatment of impedance as a constant, and the interpretation of angles in phasor representations. Multiple competing views remain throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions made about voltage and current representations, the treatment of angles, and the lack of clarity on the power factor. Some mathematical steps remain unresolved, and participants express varying levels of understanding of the concepts involved.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students studying electrical engineering, particularly those learning about AC circuit analysis, phasors, and power calculations.

Color_of_Cyan
Messages
386
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



http://imageshack.us/a/img834/8450/4y0t.jpg

Given V(s)t = 100cos100t volts, find the average power supplied by the source and the current i2t in the network.


Homework Equations



V = IR
V = IZ
Z = V/I

inductor impedance: ZL = ωLj
capacitor impedance: Zc = -1j/ωc

j*j = -1

Average power = (1/2)VmIm


The Attempt at a Solution



ω = 100


L = 50 x 10-3

ZL = ωLj

ZL = (50 x 10-3)(100)

ZL = 5jΩ



C = (1 x 10-3)F

capacitor impedance: Zc = -1j/ωc

so

Zc = -1j/(1 x 10-3)(100)

Zc = -10jΩ


Now: 15Ω || 1mF

=[ (1/15) + (-1/10j) ]-1; LCD:

= (2j/30j - 3/30j)-1

= (2j - 3/30j)-1

= 30j/(2j - 3); multiply by conjugate:

=> 30j/(2j - 3) * (-2j-3)/(-2j-3)

= -60j2 - 90j/(-4j2 - 6j + 6j + 9; now multiply out j^2s

= 60 - 90j / 13

= (4.615 - 6.92j)Ω; add to rest of impedance

Z(total) = (14.615 - 1.92j)Ω


I am really bad with the formula so not sure how to go about getting P(avg) now.

TO get I of the whole circuit I think just do I = V/Z, and then do (1/2)VmIm ?

but forgot how to get the sinusoidal function (ie 100cos100t) in phasor form
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
may I know why you didn't use scientific calculator? it simplifies the this problem..
 
100cos100t should be converted to sine form.
using trignometry
100cos(100t)=100sin((pi/2)+100t)

if you want to convert to phasor form, you should get the rms value...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
but we will use maximum value itself since your formula uses maximum values of voltage and current..so the phasor form of voltage is
V(s)t = 100|_(pi)/2(if your calculator uses degrees, then covert to degrees)
if you don't have a scientific calculator, use euler's theorem and convert V(s)t to
=100cos((pi/2))+jsin((pi/2))

i
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
there are two ways..
1.covert the impendence to phasor form..let it be Z(t). Divide the already found phasor voltage by this impedence.. you get the phasor representation of current.. You also get the maximum value, Im. You also know Vm. Thus you can get average power.
2. Divide the two complex forms of voltage and impedence , use the properties of complex numbers, and get the complex value of current. Here the imaginary part is the representation of the current...Thus you can get average power
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
I do have a scientific calculator, but just forgot / am not clear with the procedure.

Ok so for that phasor form, 100 =/= ω, right? Just the value in front of cos (which is still 100 though)?


Then V(s)t = ( 100 ∠ 90° )V ?


Forgot to say the phasor form of the total impedance that I had was

Z = (14.615 - 1.92j)Ω =>

Z = (14.7 ∠ -7.484°)Ω


so now I for the whole circuit would be

I = V/Z

I = ( 100 ∠ 90° )V/(14.7 ∠ -7.484°)Ω

I(total) = ( 6.8 ∠ 97.484°)A ?


Then I can just do current division for i2(t)... could I use this same value for
average power = (1/2)VmIm ?

Or are you saying the imaginary current is for the average power formula?
 
Here in your formula,
P= (1/2)VmIm,
we are talking about average power dissipated in the resistive part of the circuit. To be specific, Vm is the maximum value of the applied voltage, I am is the maximum value of the current passing through the resistor.
So, Vm = 100 V.
Im= 6.8 A.

You need not solve for i2(t)... sice you have simplified as you have found the eqivalent impedence...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Ok, and you don't need to do anything with the angles?

because

P =(1/2)VmIm

=> (1/2)( 6.8 ∠ 97.484°)(100 ∠ 90° )

= (340 ∠ 187.5°)

If you disregard the angle, is it just 340W?
 
Color_of_Cyan said:
Ok, and you don't need to do anything with the angles?

because

P =(1/2)VmIm

=> (1/2)( 6.8 ∠ 97.484°)(100 ∠ 90° )

= (340 ∠ 187.5°)

If you disregard the angle, is it just 340W?

No.No.. What we are interested is in average value of power dissipated in the resistive part of the circuit...The average value of power is the sum of the all instantaneous powers dissipated in the circuit in time interval divided by the time interval. It is a constant. In the last expression, you got
P=(340 ∠ 187.5°).

This phasor expression represents that the average value changes with respect to time and in itself is meaningless. Average power dissipated(in W) is a constant when a sinusoidal voltage is applied to a circuit(composed of inductors, capacitors and resistors).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #10
Let me try this again.


sharan swarup said:
2. Divide the two complex forms of voltage and impedence , use the properties of complex numbers, and get the complex value of current. Here the imaginary part is the representation of the current...Thus you can get average power

Sorry, did you mean:

I = v/z

V(t) = 100cos(100t + 0°)

Z(t) = 14.7cos(100t - 7.484°)


I = v/z

I(total) = ( 6.8 ∠ 7.484°)A ? - (This should be the correct angle for it now, right?)

x = rcosθ, y = rsinθ

I = (6.742 + 0.8856954j)

And the imaginary part (ie 0.8856954j) represents the current for Imax in the formula?
 
  • #11
you wrote Z(t) = 14.7cos(100t - 7.484°). This is wrong. For a given circuit, impedance is a constant(includeing the angle). There is no time component associated with impedence. From your expression, you say that impedence varies with time. It can't.
I think you are getting confused because you didn't know how phasors simplify the problems. In-order to avoid that, read the proof of how complex number simplify the problem.
You can also use differential equations to solve this problem. But the fact is that you should do more work to solve them.
Also we take one angle as reference and so the problem. For example, I say I apply a voltage of 100sin(100t+(pi/2)). Here, 100t is the reference angle. From here I measure the angle of (pi/2). So my phasor representation is 70.7|_(pi/2). here 70.7 is the rms value. For this circuit, you say that the current is 60.6|_100(say), then the 100 rad which you are measuring is with respect to the angle of 100t.
Impedance is constant and it is measured with respect to zero radians only.
Please do read the proof.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #12
I am not understanding the proof very well. When doing P = (1/2)Vmax*Imax, you have to convert from the RMS values first (from only the magnitude)?

I sort of understand, that you have a angle between voltage and current (in waveforms), but not so much the reference; still have trouble understanding how that works as well. (And sorry I forgot to put the "cos ø" in the formula of this phase angle between the voltage & current).

Say for

I = ( 6.8 ∠ (whatever angle)°)A

then would the magnitude in waveform (the max value) be simply

6.8 * √2?Does this mean the voltage source was already given in max form? Then it would be

Imax = 9.61

Vmax = 100

so would the average power then be (at least):

P = (1/2)(9.61)(100)*cosø ?

What would then be ø?
 
  • #13
sorry, you do need power factor in your equation( cosø). this ø is the angle between the voltage phasor and the current phasor...or in other words, it is the impedance angle
 
  • #14
"Impedance angle" isn't the same as the angle from Z in the phasor right? Or it is? Is there another way to tell what the angle is?Should have also asked, what would the phasor for v(t) = 100cos100t look like, would it be

v = 100 ∠ 0°? ( I don't think it is right though) And there does not seem to be enough information to calculate the power factor itself

(I have that Pf = (power)/(V*I), but neither power nor the power factor is given).
 
  • #15
Color_of_Cyan said:
"Impedance angle" isn't the same as the angle from Z in the phasor right? Or it is? Is there another way to tell what the angle is?


Should have also asked, what would the phasor for v(t) = 100cos100t look like, would it be

v = 100 ∠ 0°? ( I don't think it is right though)


And there does not seem to be enough information to calculate the power factor itself

(I have that Pf = (power)/(V*I), but neither power nor the power factor is given).

Yes the impedance angle is the same. It shoows the relationship between the current and voltage. For a circuit, the maximum value of voltage and current can appear at different times and the phase angle gives the relationship between these. Phase angle is determined by circuit components.

The voltage phasor should be written in rms values only. I have read 2 to 3 textbooks and they use this convention. so v=70.7∠0. here i have converted to sinusoidal form and am using voltage as reference phasor. thus the angle is 0 rad in representation.

And to your last question, the answer is that you need ø. for that, you should convert the complx impedence to phasor form. In that phasor form, you get the angle. from that angle, PF=cosø.
Thus you got PF.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #16
Ok, so would average power then be

P = (1/2)(9.61)(100)*cos(-7.484)

= 476W? For the power in power factor it would be (using root mean square values again):

cos(-7.484) = (power)/(6.8 * 70.7), it also ends up as

power = 476.6W

This is the same as the average power?
 
  • #17
the current phasor is 6.8 ∠ 97.484 A. So, Imax is 6.8 A and not 9.61 A
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #18
So to get phasors from waveforms for all values (current, voltage, etc) you have to divide by √2 then?

Or is Vmax still the same as 100? Still confused.
 
  • #19
Average power consumed is Vrms*Irms*PF or (Vmax*Imax*PF)/2
these equations are same because
Vrms=Vmax/√2
and
Irms=Imax/√2.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #20
Oh right sorry, 100 (voltage) was divided by the impedance (14.7), and they were the max values too, so 6.8 is max value too (but for current).

So (6.8)(100)(cos(-7.484))

Average power = 337W then ?
 
  • #21
yeah its right
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K