Convert Tangential Stress Around Circular Hole to XY Co-ordinates

  • Thread starter Thread starter aidiot
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
It is possible to convert tangential stress around a circular hole into x-y coordinates using tensor transformation rules, which are akin to vector transformations. The discussion highlights the need to compare results from an FEM package, which provides sigma xx and sigma yy values, with analytical values derived from Peterson's Stress Concentration Factors. To facilitate this comparison, Mohr's circle can be utilized as a method for visualizing and calculating the stress transformation. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurate stress analysis in engineering applications. The conversation emphasizes the importance of applying established methods to achieve the desired comparisons.
aidiot
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Is it possible to convert the tangential stress around a circular hole into x-y co-ordinates or vice-versa? and if so, how?

basically, i have results in sigma xx and sigma yy for certain points along the circumference from an FEM package, which need to be compared with analytical values. the analytical values, calculated using the formula found in Peterson's Stress Concentration Factors, give the tangential stress. how can i compare these.

any help appreciated... thanks in advance
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
remember that a stress is a tensor,
but of course any tensor can be converted to another system of coordinate,
by the tensor transformation rules which are very similar to those for a vector
 
lalbatros said:
remember that a stress is a tensor,
but of course any tensor can be converted to another system of coordinate,
by the tensor transformation rules which are very similar to those for a vector

thanks for that, but how does one go about doing this for this case?
 
Look up Mohr's circle, in any strength of materials textbook.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top