Converting from lb_f/in to N/m issues

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dustinsfl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Issues
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on converting units from lb_f/in to N/m for calculating the damping ratio in a physics problem. The user has converted the spring constant, mass, and damping coefficient but questions the validity of their results, particularly the unusually high damping ratio of 1000.26. They express confusion over the definition of natural frequency (ω_n) and acknowledge a mistake in their calculations regarding the mass and spring constant relationship. The conversation highlights the importance of accurate unit conversions and understanding the underlying equations in dynamics. Clarifying these aspects is essential for obtaining correct results in mechanical systems.
Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


I am trying to find a damping ratio. I know ##k=50## lb##_f##/in, ##m=50## lb, ##c = 0.75## lb##_f##-sec/in.

Homework Equations


##1## lb##_f##/in = ##175.1268## N/m
##1## lb = ##0.4536## kg

The Attempt at a Solution


Then ##k = 8756.34## N/m, ##c = 131.345## N/m-sec, and ##m = 22.675## kg.
$$
\zeta = \frac{c}{2\omega_nm} = \frac{131.345}{2(0.00259)(22.675)} = 1000.26
$$
but this seems awfully large. Are my conversion factors incorrect?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How is ##\omega_n## defined?
 
vela said:
How is ##\omega_n## defined?

Thanks. I divided m by k instead of the other way around.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top