Converting joules into a measureable mass (lbs of weight)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on converting kinetic energy (KE) measured in joules into a corresponding mass in pounds for the purpose of developing a weight training program. It highlights that KE is calculated using the formula KE = 1/2mv², which does not directly account for distance or acceleration. The conversation also notes the importance of considering potential energy, especially when running on inclines or declines, as this affects overall energy expenditure. Additionally, it suggests that biological activity is often measured in calories, which are related to joules, and emphasizes that KE alone may not provide a complete picture of energy use during physical activities. Overall, a more comprehensive approach to energy measurement may be necessary for the intended application.
christopher.h
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
It has been a long time since I have emersed myself in physics but I am trying to write a labview program that takes into account distance, speed, mass to calculate the KE of an activity such as running a mile or shorter distances like 40 yards. With the KE I am having trouble figuring out how to convert the joules from calculating KE into mass (lbs of weight) which I will use the mass to develop a structured weight training program to test upon myself. Do you have any suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not clear just what your objective is.

KE has nothing to do with distance...KE = 1/2mv2...nor does it take into
account acceleration in which I suspect you may be interested.

You know from experience running up hill is very different from running downhill...that's because potential energy as well as KE is involved...is that a consideration for you? Even a sloped treadmill is more difficult to run.

Biological activity, if that is what you seek, is often measured in calories...related of course to joules since both are measures of energy.

KE is not quite the measure unless you make adjustments you want because sitting still you'll still burn calories. I seem to recall an average adult gives of about 400 BTU per hour...whatever the figure, it's sometimes used to calculated air conditioning requirements in large rooms ..

try here...and see if any of the links are helpful...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calories
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
7K
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
717
Replies
29
Views
7K
Back
Top