Converting Logarithmic Equations to Base 2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Physicsrapper
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logarithmic
AI Thread Summary
To solve the equation log(base16)x + log(base4)x + log(base2)x = 7, it's recommended to convert all logarithms to base 2. This involves using the change of base formula, resulting in the expression being simplified to a single fraction. After consolidating the terms, the equation can be solved to find that ln x equals 4 ln 2, which leads to the conclusion that x equals 16. The method of converting logarithmic bases is essential for clarity and accuracy in solving such equations.
Physicsrapper
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
How to solve this:

log(base16)x + log(base4)x + log(base2)x = 7

If I have log(base16)x for example and i make

10^(log(base16)x)

of it, can I transform the base 16 into an exponent?

It would look like that then:

10^(logx)^16 = x^16

Would that be correct?

Then, I could solve it:

10^(logx)^16 * 10^(logx)^4 * 10^(logx)^2 = 10^7

that would be

x^16 * x^4 * x^2 = 10^7

x^22 = 10^7
22 = log(base x)10^7

Is that correct? Can I solve it this way?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I don't (think) your method is valid, but I think using Latex in your post would help clarify your idea. Here's the normal way you tackle the problem:

$$
\log _{16}x+\log_{4}x+\log_{2}x=7
$$

If you ever calculated non-natural logs on your calculator, you know that...

$$
\log_{B}x = \frac{\ln x}{\ln B}
$$

Replace all left terms by their respective fraction:

$$
\frac{\ln x}{\ln 16}+\frac{\ln x}{\ln 4}+\frac{\ln x}{\ln 2}=7
$$

Recall that ##\ln(a^b) = b\ln a##, and that ##16## and ##4## are powers of ##2##.

$$
\frac{\ln x}{\ln 2^4}+\frac{\ln x}{\ln 2^2}+\frac{\ln x}{\ln 2}=7
$$
$$
\frac{\ln x}{4\ln 2}+\frac{\ln x}{2\ln 2}+\frac{\ln x}{\ln 2}=7
$$

Find the common denominator, and consolidate the expression into one fraction:

$$
\frac{\ln x}{4\ln 2}+\frac{2\ln x}{4\ln 2}+\frac{4\ln x}{4\ln 2}=7
$$
$$
\frac{7\ln x}{4\ln 2}=7
$$

Divide by ##7## to cancel them out, and multiply each side by ##4\ln 2## to isolate \ln x.

$$
\ln x=4\ln 2
$$

Recall that ##4\ln 2 = \ln 2^4 = \ln 16##:

$$
\ln x = \ln 16.
$$

Raise both sides to e to cancel out the logarithms, and you find that:

$$
x = 16
$$
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes PFuser1232
try converting all to log2
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top