Convex set for similarity constraint

Squatchmichae
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I am trying to ultimately find the projector onto a convex set defined in a non-explicit way, for a seismic processing application.

The signals in question are members of some Hilbert Space H and the set membership requires that they must correlate with each other above some scalar \rho, given that the known signal \textbf{w} is in the set. Symbolically, I want to find a projector \textit{P} onto the convex set \textit{C}:

\begin{equation}

C = \left\{\mathbf{u}(t) : \left\langle \hat{\mathbf{u}}(t),\hat{\mathbf{v}}(t) \right\rangle \geq\rho_{0}, \forall \mathbf{v}(t) \in C, \quad where \quad \mathbf{w}(t) \in C \right\},

\end{equation}

Any intermediate help is appreciated, i.e., is there an equivalent way to formulate this set, that make finding the projector easier?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm a bit confused by how C references itself in its definition.
 
Office_Shredder said:
I'm a bit confused by how C references itself in its definition.

I understand the confusion--that is what makes the defining characteristic a little awkward. The basic idea is this: each element in the convex set \textit{C} must correlate with every other element above \rho. But we also know that a given (known) element \textbf{w}(t) is contained in \textit{C}. Is that less confusing of a statement?
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top