A Coord Transf. in Linearized GR: Understanding Metric Transformation

Woolyabyss
Messages
142
Reaction score
1
I was studying linearized GR where we make the following coordinate transformation ## \tilde{x}^{a} = x^{a} + \epsilon y^{a}(x) ##

This coordinate transformation is then meant to imply ## g_{ab}(x) = \tilde{g}_{ab}(x) + \epsilon \mathcal{L}_{Y} g_{ab} ##

Would anyone be kind enough to explain to me how the metric transformation is gotten from the coordinate transformation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To some extent, this is how the Lie derivative of the metric is defined. The Lie derivative is given by
$$
\mathcal L_Y g = \lim_{\epsilon\to 0}\left[\frac{1}{\epsilon}(\gamma_{Y}(\epsilon)^* g - g)\right],
$$
where ##\gamma_Y(\epsilon)## is the flow of the vector field ##Y## for a parameter distance ##\epsilon##. If you write this out in coordinates, you will get exactly your given relation.

(Note that ##f^*g## is the pullback of ##g## under the diffeomorphism ##f##.)
 
Noticing that the Lie Derivative for the metric is ##(\mathcal L_\xi g)_{ab} = g_{ac} \xi^c_{,b} + g_{bc} \xi^c_{,a}##
you can write down the metric in ##x+ \epsilon \xi## $$g_{ab} (x+ \epsilon \xi) d(x+ \epsilon \xi)^a d(x+ \epsilon \xi)^b = (g_{ab} + \epsilon (g_{ac} \xi^c_{,b} + g_{bc} \xi^c_{,a}))dx^a dx^b + \mathcal O (\epsilon^2) \approx (g_{ab} + \epsilon (\mathcal L_\xi g)_{ab}) dx^a dx^b$$
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Woolyabyss
kent davidge said:
Noticing that the Lie Derivative for the metric is ##(\mathcal L_\xi g)_{ab} = g_{ac} \xi^c_{,b} + g_{bc} \xi^c_{,a}##
you can write down the metric in ##x+ \epsilon \xi## $$g_{ab} (x+ \epsilon \xi) d(x+ \epsilon \xi)^a d(x+ \epsilon \xi)^b = (g_{ab} + \epsilon (g_{ac} \xi^c_{,b} + g_{bc} \xi^c_{,a}))dx^a dx^b + \mathcal O (\epsilon^2) \approx (g_{ab} + \epsilon (\mathcal L_\xi g)_{ab}) dx^a dx^b$$
This is a bit of a backwards argument. The definition of the Lie derivative is that given in #2. Based on that definition, you can derive ##(\mathcal L_\xi T)_{ab} = T_{ac} \xi^c_{,b} + T_{cb} \xi^c_{,a} + \xi^c T_{ab,c}## for an arbitrary type (0,2) tensor field ##T##. Now, if you have the Levi-Civita connection, then ##\nabla_\xi g = 0## and you would have
$$
(\mathcal L_\xi g)_{ab} = g_{ac} \xi^c_{;b} + g_{cb} \xi^c_{;a}.
$$
Note that you get some Christoffel symbols out of ##\xi^c g_{ab,c}## that turn the derivatives of the ##\xi## into covariant derivatives. Thus, you get the expression you started with from applying the definition of the Lie derivative, not the other way around.
 
  • Like
Likes Woolyabyss
Much appreciated guys. I understand now thanks.
 
  • Like
Likes kent davidge
Woolyabyss said:
I was studying linearized GR where we make the following coordinate transformation ## \tilde{x}^{a} = x^{a} + \epsilon y^{a}(x) ##

This coordinate transformation is then meant to imply ## g_{ab}(x) = \tilde{g}_{ab}(x) + \epsilon \mathcal{L}_{Y} g_{ab} ##

Would anyone be kind enough to explain to me how the metric transformation is gotten from the coordinate transformation?
Just substitute \bar{x} = x + \epsilon Y in the transformation law of the metric tensor and expand to first order in \epsilon. It is more convenient to work with the inverted transformation g_{ab}(x) = \frac{\partial \bar{x}^{c}}{\partial x^{a}}\frac{\partial \bar{x}^{d}}{\partial x^{b}} \bar{g}_{cd}(\bar{x}) . Keep in mind that infinitesimal transformation means that \bar{g}_{ab} = g_{ab} + \mathcal{O}(\epsilon). Therefore, to first order in \epsilon, you can use \epsilon \ \bar{g}_{ab}(x) = \epsilon \ g_{ab}(x) when you Tylor-expand \bar{g}_{cd} (\bar{x}) and when you multiply \bar{g}_{cd}(x) by other \epsilon-terms:
g_{ab}(x) = \left( \delta^{c}_{a} + \epsilon \ \partial_{a}Y^{c}\right) \left( \delta^{d}_{b} + \epsilon \ \partial_{b}Y^{d} \right) \left( \bar{g}_{cd}(x) + \epsilon \ Y^{e}\partial_{e} g_{cd}(x) \right) . So, to first order, you can rewrite this as - \frac{1}{\epsilon} \left( \bar{g}_{ab} - g_{ab}\right) (x) \equiv - \left( \mathcal{L}_{Y}g\right)_{ab} (x) = Y^{c}\partial_{c}g_{ab} + g_{ac}\partial_{b}Y^{c} + g_{cb}\partial_{a}Y^{c} .
 
  • Like
Likes Woolyabyss
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top