B Coordinate of side of a irregular polgyon

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter NotASmurf
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coordinate
NotASmurf
Messages
150
Reaction score
2
Hey all, I have a list of line lengths and angles, but only the angles between line n and n-1, can't find a single expression to get the coordinate that works for all cases, i tried
\sum{\sqrt{\frac{L^2 -c^2}{tan(\sum{\theta})^2+1}}} and similar expressions but they all assume triangles can be constructed for each out of straight line functions, which isn't the case, any help appreciated.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure I understand what you have and what you are trying to compute.

Here are some questions:
What is the list of line angles? Is it the angle between adjacent segments? Or is it the bearing of each segment?
If it's the angle between adjacent segments, you need the bearing on one segment.

You will also need the starting point. For example, perhaps the vertex between the first and last segment is at (0,0).

Finally, the coordinates of the other vertices can be determined by accumulating changes in X and Y from your starting point.
x1 = x0 + sin(B0)*L0
x2 = x1 + sin(B1)*L1
...

where B0, B1, ... are the angle of the lines clockwise from the X axis and the L's are the lengths.

But the key is to determine exactly what you are starting with in the way of information.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top