Coordinate Systems: When to Make the Switch?

AI Thread Summary
Switching coordinate systems can simplify mathematical problems, particularly when dealing with symmetry. A successful past experience with a similar problem can indicate when a change is beneficial. Symmetry, such as spherical or cylindrical, often guides the decision to switch coordinates. For instance, the electric field of a point charge is more easily expressed in spherical coordinates. Ultimately, the goal is to identify which coordinate system simplifies the important magnitudes or functions in a given problem.
ouchimdead
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
We may solve a function or check a theorem but sometimes the mathematics is easier when we switch from different coordinate systems. What can we look for that tells us changing is a good idea?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi
The answer to that one is that you need to have done the same thing, successfully, at some earlier stage in a similar problem. It's the sort of thing that teachers are always doing and the poor student always reacts as you have.
It's along the same lines as when they choose the best directions to resolve forces.

I guess the thing to look for would often relate to the symmetry of the situation.
 
It's a mathematical or physical intuition you have to develop. I would advise you to think about any examples you have encountered (in textbooks or in class), and think about why in that example a coordinate transformation was a good idea. Usually it's because of some spherical or cylindric symmetry.

For example we expect an electric field of a point charge te be equal in magnitude at equal distances from the charge. The coordinate system that works in the same way is the spherical system. There the distance from the origin is simply r, while in a cartesian system it's \sqrt{x^2+y^2+z^2}

In general you can try to see for each problem what the important magnitudes/functions are. If they are written in simpler form in some coordinate system, use that one.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top