Correct Distance of 28.856m between 2 Points at 350°C

  • Thread starter Thread starter Karol
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thermal
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the correct distance between two points measured with a steel ruler at 350°C, given that the ruler is accurate at 180°C. The formula used for correction takes into account the thermal expansion of steel, suggesting that the measured distance of 28.85 m should be adjusted due to temperature effects. Participants debate whether the points being measured are on the ruler or external, impacting the interpretation of the formula. Clarifications indicate that at higher temperatures, the ruler expands, leading to a larger measured distance than the actual distance at a lower temperature. Ultimately, the consensus is that the correct distance should be smaller than the measured value due to thermal contraction at the original temperature.
Karol
Messages
1,380
Reaction score
22

Homework Statement


A steel ruler is correct at 180c. when the temperature was 350c a distance of 28.85 m was measured between 2 points. what is the correct distance

Homework Equations


$$L=L_0(1-\alpha \Delta t)$$

The Attempt at a Solution


$$1+12E-6 \cdot 17^0=1.000204$$
How many big units enter in the original, correct, x, length:
$$\frac{x}{1.000204}=28.856$$
Is it correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"A steel ruler is correct at 180c. when the temperature was 350c a distance of 28.85 m was measured between 2 points. what is the correct distance"

LOGIC TEST :biggrin:! Does steel expand or contract when it gets hotter? Should your answer be larger or smaller than the distance given?

I suggest making 28.85 your original length.

Edit: clarity
 
Last edited:
Of course at a lower temperature the distances on the ruler shrink, so the count is higher, that's my logic.
The measure is taken at 35c, so at 18c the length will be longer, on the ruler, my formula is correct, i am pretty sure
 
Oh, forget what I said about the formula thing, I did it two different ways and ended up countering what I said with "making 28.85 the original length".

Anyways at a lower temperature the distance shrinks. So the count is higher? I think you are confusing the question a bit. You're not actually using to ruler to measure itself. Let's say the ruler is at 35C, and you grab another ruler to measure the distance between two points on the ruler, let's say from the 5cm to 20cm mark. When the temperature is 18C, you are still measuring from the 5cm to 20cm mark, but as you just said, the ruler shrunk, therefore your value should be smaller, at least this is how I interpreted the question, I see how you see the question.

Edit: The main difference I can tell between our approach is when it says the distance between 2 points, I assume the 2 points are on the ruler. In your case you say the points are not on the ruler, in which you would be correct. but I don't know which scenario the question wants, my reading comprehension sucks.
 
Last edited:
The points are outside the ruler
 
then its right srry for confusion
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top