Cos^2 - Sin^2 = Cos(2a): Shaum's Solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ai52487963
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    identities
Ai52487963
Messages
111
Reaction score
0
Anyone know if the difference of cos^2 and sin^2 is some obscure identity that no one's heard of?

Edit: nevermind. Shaum's tells me that cos^2 - sin^2 = cos(2a). GO SHAUMS!
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
So the answer to your question is "NO"! It is, in fact, a well known identity!

A more general identity is cos(x+ y)= cos(x)cos(y)- sin(x)sin(y). Letting x= y= a in that, cos(2a)= cos2(a)- sin2(a).
 
If you know complex numbers [including de Moivre's theorem (great chap, wasn't he) and Binomial Theorem], you can find the exact angle of any sin/cos/tan in surd form, and you can prove any double angle/triple angle/quadruple angle etc angles.

Back on topic though, yes those identities are very famous, and cos^2+sin^2 = 1 is also a darned famous one, think Pythagoras. From that you can get 2 more forms, one with sec and the other with csc
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top