Cosmological vs. Relativistic Doppler Shift

thrush
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Does anybody know a good read/primer that compares the observed cosmological redshift values to predictions made by the relativistic (gravitational) redshift?

Thank you!
 
Space news on Phys.org
The observed cosmological redshift is not viewed as a "gravitational redshift"; the latter concept applies to light emitted from an isolated gravitating body, which the universe is not.
 
Are you asking for comparision of what is observed and what is predicted by the theory?
 
Sorry I missed the response emails...

The observed cosmological redshift is not viewed as a "gravitational redshift"; the latter concept applies to light emitted from an isolated gravitating body, which the universe is not.

Sounds right, thank you.

Are you asking for comparision of what is observed and what is predicted by the theory?

Thank you, yes. What I am looking for is a primer on the comparison between the estimated spectral line redshift from say, a star:

\frac{\lambda_{r}}{\lambda_{e}}=\frac{\sqrt{1-\frac{2GM}{R_{r}C^{2}}}}{\sqrt{1-\frac{2GM}{R_{e}C^{2}}}}

and that which is actually measured here on Earth, and how the two differ. It's actually for a citation, so almost anything will do.

THANKS!
 
Last edited:
thrush said:
What I am looking for is a primer on the comparison between the estimated spectral line redshift from say, a star:

Just to confirm, this is not "cosmological redshift". This is ordinary gravitational redshift, and it has been measured in spectral lines from the Sun and from white dwarfs, and the results are in agreement with the GR prediction. See, for example, here:

http://www.einstein-online.info/spotlights/redshift_white_dwarfs

This article notes that many sources quote gravitational redshifts as a speed, which can cause confusion: this does not mean that the gravitational redshift is due to the Doppler effect. Nor does it mean that gravitational redshift is the same as cosmological redshift, which is also often quoted as a recession speed. Cosmological redshift is due to the expansion of the universe, and the formula for it is quite different from the one you give.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top