MHB No problem! Glad I could help.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Johnx1
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a system of equations to determine the cost of a badminton racquet. Two equations are established based on the costs of badminton racquets and baseball bats, leading to the conclusion that one badminton racquet costs $25. The method of elimination is highlighted as an effective approach to solve the equations. Participants agree that while the original method was correct, using single letters for variables could simplify the process. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of clarity and efficiency in mathematical problem-solving.
Johnx1
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
3 badminton racquets and 2 baseball bats cost \$167. 1 badminton racquet and 3 baseball bats cost \$163. How much does 1 badminton racquet cost?

My answer:

=> 1 badminton = 163 - 3baseball

=> 3(163 - 3 baseball) + 2 baseball = 167
= 489 - 9 baseball + 2 baseball = 167

=> 7 baseball = -322
= baseball = 46

=> 3 badminton + 2(46) = 167

so, the answer is badminton = 25Is there a better way to do this, or did I made it more difficult for me?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would let \(R\) be the cost of each racquet and \(B\) be the cost of each bat. Using the information provided, I would write:

$$3R+2B=167$$

$$R+3B=163$$

I would then multiply the first equation by 3 and the second equation by -2:

$$9R+6B=501$$

$$-2R-6B=-326$$

Now, we can add the two equations, and eliminate \(B\), because we are interested in finding \(R\)

$$7R=175$$

And so:

$$R=25\quad\checkmark$$

I don't see anything wrong with what you did, except I would use single letters to represent quantities in your equations. But your method led to the correct answer.
 
MarkFL said:
I would let \(R\) be the cost of each racquet and \(B\) be the cost of each bat. Using the information provided, I would write:

$$3R+2B=167$$

$$R+3B=163$$

I would then multiply the first equation by 3 and the second equation by -2:

$$9R+6B=501$$

$$-2R-6B=-326$$

Now, we can add the two equations, and eliminate \(B\), because we are interested in finding \(R\)

$$7R=175$$

And so:

$$R=25\quad\checkmark$$

I don't see anything wrong with what you did, except I would use single letters to represent quantities in your equations. But your method led to the correct answer.
Thank you for showing me a way doing it by elimination :-)
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top