Undergrad Could a Gaussian beam be described as parallel at a large distance?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the approximation of a Gaussian beam as parallel light at distances significantly greater than the Rayleigh distance (##z \gg z_R##). The mathematical representation of the Gaussian beam is provided, highlighting parameters such as the electric field amplitude (##E_0##), waist radius (##w_0##), and Gouy phase (##\psi(z)##). The approximation simplifies the analysis by treating the beam as parallel when received by a finite detection area, with the curvature term and Gouy phase considered negligible. The conversation also touches on the concept of phase error in wavefronts and its relevance to the analysis of Gaussian beams.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gaussian beam propagation and parameters such as Rayleigh distance (##z_R##).
  • Familiarity with the mathematical representation of electromagnetic waves, including complex exponentials.
  • Knowledge of optical concepts like waist radius (##w(z)##) and Gouy phase (##\psi(z)##).
  • Basic principles of power transmission in optics, including the relationship between transmitter power (##P_t##) and received power (##P_r##).
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of Gaussian beam divergence beyond the Rayleigh distance.
  • Study the concept of phase error in optical systems and its impact on beam quality.
  • Explore literature on the approximation of wavefronts in optical detection systems.
  • Investigate the mathematical modeling of Gaussian beams in various applications, including telecommunications and laser optics.
USEFUL FOR

Optical engineers, physicists, and researchers in the field of laser technology and beam propagation who are analyzing Gaussian beam behavior at large distances.

Haorong Wu
Messages
419
Reaction score
90
Hello, there. Suppose a Gaussian beam is sent and is received at a great large distance, i.e., the propagation distance ##z \gg z_R## the Rayleigh distance.

The Gaussian beam can be described by $$E_0 \frac {1}{w(z)} \exp \left ( \frac {-r^2}{w(z)^2}\right )\exp\left ( -i\left (kz+k\frac {r^2}{2R(z)}-\psi(z)\right )\right ) $$
where ##E_0## is the amplitude of the electric field, ##w_0## is the waist radius, ##w(z)## is the radius of the beam at ##z##, ##k## is the frequency, ##R(z)## is the radius of curvature of the beam's wavefronts at ##z##, and ##\psi(z)## is the Gouy phase.

When the distance ##z## is larger than the Rayleigh distance ##z_R##, the beam will diverge noticeably. In my scenario, the propagation distance ##z## is so large that the curvature of the wavefront will approach zero. In order to simplify my analysis, I would like to treat them as parallel light when received by a finite small detection area. And since the other part that is not detected is lost, I modeled the light to be as a beam with a waist radius ##w_d##, which is the radius of the detection area, such as $$E_d \frac {1}{w_d} \exp \left ( \frac {-r^2}{w_d^2}\right )\exp\left ( -ikz \right ) $$ where ## E_d## is the received amplitude, the curvature term vanishes and the Gouy phase can be harmlessly removed.

But my professor said that he is not sure whether this approximation is correct or not and asked me to find more related papers. However, I have searched in Google scholar for days without success. Could you help me with this analysis or share possible materials? Thanks in advance.
 
Science news on Phys.org
In radio wave propagation beyond the Rayleigh Distance, we normally assume that phase error due to curvature is zero. Of course, all beams will diverge beyond the Rayleigh Distance.
 
Hi, @tech99. Thanks for your reply. I am not familiar with the concept of phase error. On some websites, it reads that phase err (phase error) is the phase difference between the I/Q reference signal and the I/Q measured signal, averaged over all symbol points. But this seems not to be related to optics. Could you refer me to some materials? Thanks!
 
I was just considering the phase error across a curved wavefront, which is negligible.
Not sure about the concept of using a waist diameter wd.
If you know the transmitter power, Pt, then received power Pr = Pt x detector area/beam area at distance z.
Received electric field strength = sqrt (377 x Pr)
If you don't know transmitter power but know Eo then you can find it from: Pt = waist area x Eo^2/377
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K