Could charges on a sphere cause it to explode?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter manofphysics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charges Sphere
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of charges on a sphere and whether the repulsive forces between like charges could lead to the sphere exploding. Participants explore concepts from electrostatics, including charge distribution, equilibrium forces, and comparisons to parallel plate capacitors.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether a uniformly charged sphere would explode due to the repulsive forces between like charges on its surface.
  • Another participant argues that if the charges are evenly distributed, the forces are in equilibrium, suggesting that the sphere would not explode.
  • A different viewpoint suggests that the repulsive forces could lead to a decrease in pressure within the sphere, indicating a net radial outward force.
  • One participant brings up the analogy of free charges on a parallel plate capacitor, implying similar principles may apply.
  • Another participant discusses the implications of charge distribution on water droplets, suggesting that charged droplets may experience different evaporation rates due to internal pressure changes.
  • A later post introduces calculations regarding the capacitance of a sphere and the implications of charging it with a significant amount of charge, raising questions about the resulting voltage and energy considerations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether the repulsive forces would lead to an explosion, with some arguing for equilibrium and others suggesting potential pressure changes. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

Some participants reference specific calculations and analogies that may depend on assumptions about charge distribution and physical properties, which are not fully explored in the discussion.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying electrostatics, physics students exploring charge behavior, or individuals curious about the implications of charge distribution in various contexts.

manofphysics
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
Ok, this question may sound stupid to some. But still, I 'll ask.

In electrostatics we frequently discuss, potential due to uniformly charged sphere.where the whole sphere's surface has positive or negative charge.
So, this means, free charges of the same type(+ve or -ve) have been distributed all over the surface.

Now, my question is , won't the sphere explode because of repelling forces between the free charges which are present on the surface of the sphere(as they are all positive or all negative)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well if the charges are distributed evenly over the surface, then the repulsive force are not radial.

The forces acting on the charges are in equilibrium so everything is balanced hence if the sphere. The equilibrium exists because no matter in which direction you look from a particular charge you see the same number of charges at every distance. So the net force is the same in all directions I believe.
 
If charges are distributed uniformly over the surface of a sphere, they repel each other and this manifests in a decrease of the pressure in the sphere (there is net radial outward force proportional to surface area). Try to calculate the force! For this you must find the intensity right at the radius where charges are.
 
I would also like to ask, what about the free charges on one plate of a parallel plate capacitor?
 
That's the same. You just find the intensity at the first plate (caused by the second plate) and then multiply it by the total charge on the first plate and you get the force. However, the sphere is a bit more interesting. This has an application in the physics of water droplets. When the droplet starts forming in the air, it is very small and thus has very high pressure inside due to capillarity. This leads to high rate of evaporation of molecules from the droplet and it is likely that such a droplet would quickly vaporize. But imagine that our droplet contains some net charge. Then this charge will distribute on its surface and will cause decrease of the pressure inside and therefore to decrease of evaporation rate. Then this droplet can more easily survive and starts to grow. That's probably how Wilson chamber works - charged particles facilitates droplet forming.
 
Thanks very much for the answers , Jano L.
 
There are two 1 Farad (1 million microfarad), 20 volt aluminum capacitors (3 " diameter) for sale at www.digikey.com. (1/2)C V^2 = 200 joules; not very much energy.
[Edit] According to Wiki, the self capacitance of a sphere of radius R is
C = 4 pi e0 R, so for a sphere of radius 0.5 meters
the capacitance C = 56 picoFarads.
If we took the charge (Q = CV = 20 Coulombs) on the 1 Farad capacitor above, and charged this sphere, the voltage would then be

V = Q/C =20 Coulombs/56 picoFarads = 357 billion volts.

So 20 Coulombs is a lot of charge, especially in a 3" diameter capacitor.
See
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capacitance#Self-capacitance
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K