Could Cosmic Background Radiation Hold Clues About the Big Bang?

AI Thread Summary
Cosmic microwave background radiation (CMBR) originated from the Big Bang and fills the universe isotropically, meaning it surrounds us rather than being "ahead" of us. The CMBR represents highly redshifted radiation emitted about 300,000 years after the Big Bang, when matter cooled enough to become transparent. The universe's expansion is not an explosion but a rapid expansion of space itself, with energy and matter distributed throughout. As space expanded, this primordial plasma cooled, allowing atoms to form and eventually leading to the creation of stars and galaxies. Understanding the CMBR is crucial for insights into the universe's early state and evolution.
BigMacnFries
Problaby a silly thought but if the cosmic microwave backgroud radiation got created in the big bang and traveled outwards at the speed of light, and so did everything else, but traveled at less than the speed of light, would'nt it be "ahead" of us. Or alternatively if the radiation is absorbed and reemitted a lot does it get affected by fluorescense, or absorbtion into kinetic energy.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Welcome to these Forums BigMacnFries! (Actually I can't stand them myself!)
Where is the Big Bang? we might ask, and the answer is everywhere! All points in space have expanded from the Big Bang equally, they have all expanded from each other, there is no centre, it is space itself that has expanded. Now the CMB has filled all space and radiated throughout it. The radiation is not 'ahead of us' but surrounding us. The universe is filled with a warm (if you call 2.7oK 'warm') bath of radiation and it comes to us equally from every direction (isotropically) -well not quite isotropic but that is another story!

I hope this helps,

Garth
 
BigMacnFries said:
Problaby a silly thought but if the cosmic microwave backgroud radiation got created in the big bang and traveled outwards at the speed of light, and so did everything else, but traveled at less than the speed of light, would'nt it be "ahead" of us. Or alternatively if the radiation is absorbed and reemitted a lot does it get affected by fluorescense, or absorbtion into kinetic energy.
The CMBR is not like a gas in thermal equilibrium. Rather it is much like the light from a galaxy, or any other object. What we are seeing is highly redshifted radiation emitted by matter 300000 years after the big bang, just before this matter cooled enough to become transparent.

If you want to understand how the radiation can have taken so long to reach us then have a look at
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmo_02.htm#DH
and
http://www.chronon.org/Articles/milne_cosmology.html
 
Welcome to PF, BigMacnFries!
As noted above, the Big Bang was not an explosion of matter and energy into space. It was the rapid expansion of all-space. From the beginning, energy and the building blocks of matter were already everywhere throughout the universe. As space continued to expand, this 'plasma' cooled enough for the building blocks to form atoms (like hydrogen, helium). Then gravity pulled this matter together to form stars & galaxies...simultaneously throughout the universe. So, things were not shot out across the universe...rather, the state of the universe and the stuff in it changed over time.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top