Could Discrete Spacetime Redefine General Relativity in Cosmology?

Richo
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
Would general relativity (axiom: spacetime is continuous) still work if we changed the axiom to:
spacetime is discrete (but each individual chunk of it is so incredibly small* relative to a quark or gluon
that it makes no difference)?

*e.g. 3D's of Planck length, 1D of Planck time
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I was advised to use a Homework forum. If this is inappropriate, please advise if you know the right forum for me to pose such questions.
As a senior in retirement, physics is my 'home work' but not my 'homework', sorry.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top