Could Gravitons Be the Missing Link to Understanding Dark Matter?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the connection between gravitons and dark matter, suggesting that undetectable gravitons could account for dark matter's gravitational effects in galaxies. However, it is clarified that gravitons are massless and not expected to be concentrated in hadrons, which contradicts the initial hypothesis. Dark matter, particularly as Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMPs), does possess mass and can be detected through interactions with other particles. The nature of gravitons, moving at light speed, makes it unlikely for them to clump like cold dark matter. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of understanding dark matter and the role of gravitons in this context.
Vons
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey guys, I was just pondering the idea of dark matter and a thought crossed my mind.

I may be entirely off, but a few connections can be made between gravitons and dark matter. Neither can be detected directly with any classical methods (EM, pressure, etc..), and dark matter has no apparent "mass", for its mass is attributed to the excess of gravitational force in galaxies. Perhaps free-floating gravitons that are concentrated around galaxies and are undetectable a possible suspect for dark matter? I know that, theoretically, gravitons are supposed to be contained in hadrons, but perhaps a large amount of them were not bonded with matter during the big bang?

Is this even possible?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Vons said:
I know that, theoretically, gravitons are supposed to be contained in hadrons, but perhaps a large amount of them were not bonded with matter during the big bang?
I think you've misread something along the way. Gravitons are not expected to be concentrated inside hadrons.

Dark matter, if understood as a WIMP, does have a mass, and can be detected 'classically' by looking for collisions between dark matter particles and those in liquid detectors. WIMPs of the right mass and interaction strength do well to explain the phenomenology of galaxy rotation curves, CMB oscillations, and structure formation.

Gravitons are massless, and are currently only understood in GR perturbatively (as gravitational waves). It's not clear how a relativistic species like gravitons might clump in the way cold dark matter does. In other words, whatever is comprising the cold dark matter of the universe, it is gravitationally unstable (it forms clumps). Gravitons move at the speed of light and would simply flow out of overdensities.
 
Thank you for clearing that up mate. It seems I have misread something.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top