Could Humans Become Cyborgs in the Next Century?

  • Thread starter Thread starter NeedBioInfo
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the possibility of humans becoming cyborgs, defined as part human and part machine, within the next century. One participant claims to already be a cyborg, prompting clarification on the definition of the term. The conversation also highlights the relevance of brain-computer interface technology, suggesting that advancements in this area could contribute to the evolution of cyborgs. A link to a resource on wearable technology is provided for further exploration of the topic.
NeedBioInfo
Messages
177
Reaction score
0
My friend thinks that it's *possible* that we could become cyborgs (part human/part machine) in the next century so I started this thread to get information on that
 
Biology news on Phys.org
heh. I'm already a cyborg. Dude.. you need to learn the definition of cyborg..
While you're on that, check up on brain-computer interface technology.
 
Last edited:
http://wearables.blu.org
 
https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/conditions/body-dysmorphia/ Most people have some mild apprehension about their body, such as one thinks their nose is too big, hair too straight or curvy. At the extreme, cases such as this, are difficult to completely understand. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/health/other/why-would-someone-want-to-amputate-healthy-limbs/ar-AA1MrQK7?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=68ce4014b1fe4953b0b4bd22ef471ab9&ei=78 they feel like they're an amputee in the body of a regular person "For...
Thread 'Did they discover another descendant of homo erectus?'
The study provides critical new insights into the African Humid Period, a time between 14,500 and 5,000 years ago when the Sahara desert was a green savanna, rich in water bodies that facilitated human habitation and the spread of pastoralism. Later aridification turned this region into the world's largest desert. Due to the extreme aridity of the region today, DNA preservation is poor, making this pioneering ancient DNA study all the more significant. Genomic analyses reveal that the...
Whenever these opiods are mentioned they usually mention that e.g. fentanyl is "50 times stronger than heroin" and "100 times stronger than morphine". Now it's nitazene which the public is told is everything from "much stronger than heroin" and "200 times stronger than fentany"! Do these numbers make sense at all? How do they arrive at them? Kill thousands of mice? En passant: nitazene have already been found in both Oxycontin pills and in street "heroin" here, so Naloxone is more...
Back
Top