I Could Passing Asteroids Alter Milanković Cycles and Trigger Climate Change?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Gulfton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cycles
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the potential impact of close fly-bys of large asteroids on Earth's climate, specifically regarding Milanković cycles. It highlights that while Chiron, a 200 km object, could theoretically alter Earth's velocity and temperature, the effect would be minimal compared to current global warming trends. The conversation speculates on the dramatic effects larger bodies, like the Moon, could have if they passed close to Earth. However, participants emphasize the importance of basing discussions on established scientific facts rather than speculation. Ultimately, the thread underscores the need for rigorous adherence to scientific principles in discussing such phenomena.
Gulfton
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary
What phenomena could possibly affect Milanković cycles?
Our planet being smacked by a huge asteroid is a common doomsday trope. But what if our planet didn't actually get smacked but came close to getting smacked? Could a sufficiently large body, or perhaps a group of several large bodies, pass close enough to alter the workings of the Milanković cycles such that our planet might go into a premature ice age or heat up enough to melt the polar ice caps for good? Are there any other theoretical phenomena that could accomplish the same?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Earth is big compared to every object that could realistically make a close fly-by.

Chiron with a diameter of ~200 km is the largest object in a very unstable orbit. It has a non-zero chance to make a close fly-by at Earth in the next few million years. It has less than 1/100,000 of Earth's mass. An ideal close fly-by could potentially change Earth's velocity by ~0.1 m/s, changing the mean distance to the Sun by up to 1 part in 300,000 and changing the equilibrium temperature by something like 0.001 K (all orders of magnitude estimates). The global average temperature is currently rising by ~0.2 K per decade, so this is of the same scale as one month of global warming in either direction - and even that needs extremely unlikely conditions to happen.
Gulfton said:
that our planet might go into a premature ice age or heat up enough to melt the polar ice caps for good? Are there any other theoretical phenomena that could accomplish the same?
Humans are working on the ice caps...
 
  • Informative
Likes berkeman
Appreciate the detailed response. I was aware that the known bodies that could possibly give us a close call are relatively small; you show that even a small body like Chiron could tweak things, albeit just a wee bit. I would assume then that larger bodies would do considerably more tweaking. Think of something the size of our moon, or maybe even a couple of bodies that big, traveling in tandem. Or even bigger bodies. Would it be safe to assume that IF such a thing were to happen that it would have a dramatic effect on the Milanković cycles? (If you take this and run with it, you might be able to pitch it to Hollywood as the plot for a blockbuster disaster movie.)
 
We do not handle or tolerate speculation well on PF. Content is based on known facts: Textbooks, Journal articles, articles in arXiv, MIT video courses

Example:NASA datasets you may want to connect to
https://www.nasa.gov/planetarydefense/neoo and see what is out there.Please follow our guidelines and rules.
Thread locked
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top