Could somebody confirm this answer for me please?

  • Thread starter Thread starter djames1009
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem involving a particle of mass 2kg subjected to a drag force. The initial conditions are given as x(0)=0 m and v(0)=1 m/s. The derived expression for displacement is x(t)=4(ln(t+4)-ln(4)), and the calculated position at t=4 seconds is x(4)=4ln(2) m. There is a minor correction noted regarding a misstatement in the calculations, but overall, the solution appears to be accurate. The final expression and value for x(4) are confirmed as correct.
djames1009
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Could somebody confirm this answer for me please? :)

A particle of mass 2kg is subject to a drag force from the air: F(v)= -0.5v^2. The initial displacement of the mass is zero and the initial speed is 1ms. Find an expression for x(t) and hence work out x(4)
From the initial conditions we know that:
x(0)=0 m
v(0)=1 m/s

I'm going to keep using the notations v(t) and x(t) to try to remind you that v and x are functions of t, which is very important when doing calculus.

For a constant mass:
F(v(t))=ma=m\frac{dv(t)}{dt}=-0.5v(t)^2
So:
\frac{dv(t)}{dt}=\frac{-0.5v(t)^2}{m}=\frac{-v(t)^2}{4}

-\int\frac{1}{v^2}dv=\int\frac{1}{4}dt
Integrating gives:
\frac{1}{v(t)}=\frac{t}{4}+c=\frac{t+4c}{4}
\Rightarrow v(t)=\frac{4}{t+C}
Since, from the second initial condition:
v(0)=\frac{4}{0+C}=1 m/s
Then:
C=4
Giving:
v(t)=\frac{dx(t)}{dt}=\frac{4}{t+4}
Integrating with respect to t:
\int\frac{dx(t)}{dt}dt=\int\frac{4}{t+4}dt
Gives:
x(t)=4ln(t+4)+b
Since, from the first initial condition:
x(0)=4ln(0+4)+b=0
Then:
b=-4ln(4)
Which gives the final equation for displacement, x(t):
x(t)=4(ln(t+4)-ln(4))=4ln(\frac{t+4}{4})
And:
x(4)=4ln(\frac{4+4}{4})=4ln(2) m
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Well everything looks great, except in the second line where you said 0.5 = 1/4.
 


grindfreak said:
Well everything looks great, except in the second line where you said 0.5 = 1/4.

Skipping units I think he said 0.5/m=1/4. Since m=2 kg this looks reasonable IMO.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top