Could someone explain to me array notation

AI Thread Summary
Array notation is a mathematical representation used to express large numbers, particularly in combinatorics, but its practical applications in physics are limited. Some users express skepticism about its usefulness, arguing that traditional scientific notation suffices for most calculations in physics. The discussion highlights a specific notation involving upward arrows to denote extremely large quantities, with an example related to Ramsey numbers. While some find the notation intriguing, others view it as overly complex and unnecessary. Overall, array notation may not be widely encountered outside of specific mathematical contexts.
Mk
Messages
2,039
Reaction score
4
Could someone explain to me "array notation"

I found it here, but I still don't understand it. Though I probably don't need to know it, I want to. Also, will I encounter this anywhere else?

http://members.aol.com/hedrondude/array.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I understand it's useful for large number. I see these kinds of numbers as a field in pure math. I don't see how they can relate to physics or practical situations. From what I know, the largest quanties in physics can be delt with with exponentials (number of atoms in Universe, and such things). Large numbers may be encontered if tried to count something like how many total forces are presently acting in the Universe, but I'm willing to say most physicists never come by such numbers.
 
Yikes, this guy's a total crackpot. What he's describing is some strange machination he made up. No one in the world but him understands it, and it doesn't seem to have any benefits over normal scientific notation. Besides, look at the number of rules you'd have to learn to use it!

- Warren
 
I recall a notation for writing huge numbers that has been used in combinatorics.
(The actual symbol was an upwards arrow, but I don't know how to express that in Latex)

Let a?a=a^{a}
Let a?^{2}a=a?(a?a)
a?^{3}a=a?(a?^{2}a)
and so on.

One humongous number (the Ramsey number, I believe), can be expressed with the following sequence:
f(0)=3
f(n)=3?^{f(n-1)}3
The Ramsey number is given as f(63)..:wink:
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top