Could someone please explain this? (HW-related)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jamin2112
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Explain
Jamin2112
Messages
973
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement



So the last thing we got to learn before studying for finals ...

Homework Equations



... was converting something like

dx/dt = F(x,y)
dy/dt = G(x,y)

into a ...

The Attempt at a Solution



... system of equations like (x' y')T = J * (x y)T,

where J is the Jacobian Matrix [ (∂F/∂x ∂G/∂x)T , (∂D/∂y ∂G/∂y)T ].

I'm just wondering why exactly that works. Could someone show me a proof or something? Being the weird dude I am, I need to know these things. :wink:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hm, perhaps you're approximating a nonlinear system by a linear. I'm thinking 'taylor expansion', but then this may be my response to everything. do you happen to know if the initial point is [F(x_o,y_o),G(x_o,y_o)]=[0,0]? that might help clarify things a bit...
 
xaos is right, this "conversion" of the problem is a local approximation of your F,G functions to an linear (or affine) function. In general the set of equations you give is not linear, the only way to "linearize" it is to do this Taylor expansion (assuming the F and G were not already linear).
 
Alright. I'll just roll with it.
 
In other words, at some point (x_0,y_0), F(x,y) is replaced by its "tangent plane approximation",
\frac{\partial F}{\partial x}(x_0,y_0)(x- x_0)+ \frac{\partial F(x_0, y_0)}{\partial y}(y- y_0)+ F(x_0, y_0)
and G(x, y) is replaced by its "tangent plane approximation",
\frac{\partial G}{\partial x}(x_0,y_0)(x- x_0)+ \frac{\partial G}{\partial y}(x_0, y_0)(y- y_0)+ G(x_0, y_0)

Now, you have the two equations
\frac{dx}{dt}= \frac{\partial F}{\partial x}(x_0,y_0)(x- x_0)+ \frac{\partial F(x_0, y_0)}{\partial y}(y- y_0)+ F(x_0, y_0)
\frac{dy}{dt}= \frac{\partial G}{\partial x}(x_0,y_0)(x- x_0)+ \frac{\partial G}{\partial y}(x_0, y_0)(y- y_0)+ G(x_0, y_0)

which we can write as the matrix equation
\frac{d}{dt}\begin{pmatrix}x \\ y\end{pmatrix}= \begin{pmatrix}\frac{\partial F}{\partial x}(x_0, y_0) & \frac{\partial F}{\partial y}(x_0, y_0) \\ \frac{\partial G}{\partial x}(x_0, y_0) & \frac{\partial G}{\partial y}(x_0, y_0)\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}x- x_0 \\ y- y_0\end{pmatrix}+ \begin{pmatrix}F(x_0, y_0) \\ G(x_0, y_0)\end{pmatrix}
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top