Could something be seen going the speed of light?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether an object traveling at the speed of light could be seen if it interacted with light rays. While light itself travels at light speed and is visible, detecting a massless particle or an object moving at light speed requires different methods. It is suggested that using matter to detect such objects is more effective, as collisions with matter can produce visible light. The conversation clarifies that direct observation of something moving at light speed isn't feasible, but indirect detection through interactions with matter is possible. Ultimately, the ability to see such an object relies on its interaction with other particles rather than observing it directly.
|Orion's Thought|
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
Could something be seen going the speed of light? Shouldnt we be able to see it if the "light rays" reflected off of it (assuming it is not on a vector away from the sun, and not parallel to the beams of light being emmited from the sun)?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
|Orion's Thought| said:
Could something be seen going the speed of light?

Sure, light goes at the speed of light and we see it all the time. :smile:


Shouldnt we be able to see it if the "light rays" reflected off of it (assuming it is not on a vector away from the sun, and not parallel to the beams of light being emmited from the sun)?

Depends on the kind of massless particle. Light can reflect other light, but only very weakly. You're better off using matter to "see" it.
 
Sure, light goes at the speed of light and we see it all the time.

Good point! I think I didnt word the second part of my question very well, I meant that you would be able to see something such as an asteroid going the speed of light as long as it ran into light rays.
 
|Orion's Thought| said:
Good point! I think I didnt word the second part of my question very well, I meant that you would be able to see something such as an asteroid going the speed of light as long as it ran into light rays.

I know what you meant, but what I'm trying to say is that you don't need to use light to detect something moving at light speed. You can have it run into matter, which will then emit light that you can see with your eyes (or some other instrument).
 
OOOH! I see. Thanks!:smile:
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top