Could somone explain me this question?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DEWANA
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Explain
AI Thread Summary
The homework question asks students to write an article on one of three broad topics: forms of animals and/or plant life, the mind and behavior, or diagnosis and treatment of disease. The focus should be on a significant scientific development related to the chosen topic. An example provided is discussing advancements in Arachnid anti-venoms under the first topic. It is suggested that discussing the current situation of animals is also acceptable. Once completed, sharing the article for feedback is encouraged.
DEWANA
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I have got a homework but I am not understand the question...could someone explain it to me?

question: Write an article based on one of the broad topic areas listed below, and discuss one significant scientific development arising from studies in that areas:

- Forms of animals and/or plant life
- The mind and behaviour
- Diagnosis or treatment of disease, disorder or injury



I hope somone can help me! Thanks so much!

best wishes

Maria
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Basically the question is telling you to pick one of those 3 options, and write an article on that topic, with your main point being a new discovery in that topic.

For example, if you chose forms of animals and/or plant life, you might decide to write an article on Arachnids, and perhaps there has been a development in the production of Arachnid anti-venoms. I don't actually know if that example is valid though.
 
Hi Gib Z thanks for the fast answer! Do you think can I write as well about the currently situation about the animals? Do u think it is ok? Or not?

best wishes
maria
 
O Yes it should be ok =] Perhaps when you are done you should post it here for some people to take a quick skim through, they may not be able to tell you an accurate and detailed evaluation of the article, but they'll be able to tell you if it generally answered the question.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top