Could Tachyons Exist in a Parallel Universe?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the theoretical existence of tachyons, particles that could move faster than light, potentially originating from the Big Bang. While some interpretations of Einstein's equations suggest the possibility of such particles, many argue that these solutions lack physical meaning and do not imply the existence of a parallel universe. The consensus is that tachyons, if they exist, would not be able to interact with our physical reality, making detection impossible. This inability to interact raises concerns about violating causality, a fundamental principle in physics. Overall, the physics community remains skeptical about tachyons without substantial evidence.
typical guy
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
If you look at Einstein's equations, is it possible that an entire universe of objects exists that were created at the big bang that move faster than the speed of light but have a lower speed limit equal to light while we have an upper limit equal to the speed of light? I remember hearing something along these lines some 10+ years ago. So if objects are moving faster than the speed of light, what could be done to detect them?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The hypothetical particles you refer to are known as tachyons, you can look them up for more information.

My personal interpretation of the equations is that these solutions are meaningless. After all, say a cubic equation comes up in some physically relevant problem and there is only one real root. Do we say there exists another universe, separate but disconnected, in which the two complex roots are manifest in some physical form? No, almost anyone would say that's nonsense. My opinion of the equations of relativity is analogous.

But just to give you a bit of information about those who do take the possibility (somewhat) seriously, your description is correct. However, these objects cannot interact with our physical reality. This includes being able to detect them in ANY way (of course, this necessarily must involve interaction!). If they could, causality would be violated and I do not think the physics community at large will ever be willing to throw that out the window unless there is overwhelming evidence to support such a conclusion.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top