Could the Speed of Light be Calculated Differently?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the concept of the speed of light, questioning whether it could be calculated differently by using two lengths and two frequencies instead of simply squaring the speed of light (c). This alternative approach suggests that if c² could be derived from different parameters, it might open new theoretical possibilities for manipulating time. However, the consensus is that the only frequencies and lengths that align with this idea are those related to the wavelength and frequency of light, ultimately leading back to the original conclusion that c remains constant. The implications of this discussion highlight the complexities and limitations inherent in our understanding of light's speed. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the foundational role of the speed of light in physics.
orlandodelavega
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
The speed of light turns out to be a strange idea for many persons, it imposes to the transmission of physical information a very annoying limit.

And the question is, if the speed of light to the square was not the result of multiplying (c) for (c) ?, but out the result of multiplying two lengths by two different frequencies to (c).
Surely (c) would always be the result of (cˆ2) square root .

The consequences would be very interesting, at least theoretically there would be opened a few new possibilities of being able to handle the Time.

It seems that (c . c) = cˆ2
but really it is ( x ). ( y ) = cˆ2

Regards
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
That doesn't make a whole lot of sense: The only frequencie and length that fit there are the wavelength and frequency of light. So you still end up with C.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Replies
42
Views
658
3
Replies
120
Views
8K
Replies
5
Views
336
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top