Could Time Dilation be Caused by Increased Clock Energy?

D.Hayward
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Im definitely not an expert in this field but i have a question. From what I've picked up time dilation can be observed when a clock has a velocity or moves away from the centre of Earth and it slows/speeds up. In both these cases the clock has more energy, be it potential or kinetic. Could this increase in energy cause the atomic clocks to speed up somehow? I know the increase in energy is small but so is the time dilation. This could be very wrong as i don't quite understand how these clocks work (a semi-simple explanation would be nice), but i feel like it would make sense if they speed up when they had more energy. I am probably wrong but i just want to know why.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you are suggesting that instead of time dilation, we're seeing errors on clocks due to motion, right? Well:

1. Your kinetic energy is always zero in your reference frame. So to you, there is no difference between being in motion and being stationary (or, rather, you are always stationary to yourself). So there can be no clock-specific effect of motion. If there were, we'd notice such effects in other phenomena when in motion (such as not being able to play catch on a moving train.
2. The most accurate clocks are not mechanical.
 
Clocks traveling fast usually tick slower actually. Some short lived particles can be seen for far longer than the normal lifetime of the particle when they are going fast through a particle accelerator. This can be explained by time dilation. So it is not just clocks but anything that moves in space also moves in time.. However small that might be.

In a clock you count a recurring phenomena like the swinging of a pendulum or the oscillations of something that happens periodically. If that oscillation is stable then you can call each oscillation one unit of time or a number of oscillations a unit of time. In an atomic clock the frequency is usually set by a transition between hyperfine states. In cesium this is around 9 ghz and this defines our second. This frequency is in the microwave region of the spectrum.
 
thanks guys that clears it up.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top