MHB Could you explain me about 'relation algebraic property with conjugate'?

bw0young0math
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone. At first, I appreciate your click this page.

I have a book named 'A first Course in Abstract Algebra 7th' by Fraleigh.

I have a question about 'relation algebraic property with conjugate' in automorhisms of fields.
in page415,
this book explains "Let E is algebraic extension of F& a,b∈E. Then a and b have the same algebraic property iff irr(a,F)=irr(b,F)."
What's mean algebraic property in that sentense? If you explain me, I will be happy:)Thanks. Have a nice day:)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bw0young0math said:
Hello everyone. At first, I appreciate your click this page.

I have a book named 'A first Course in Abstract Algebra 7th' by Fraleigh.

I have a question about 'relation algebraic property with conjugate' in automorhisms of fields.
in page415,
this book explains "Let E is algebraic extension of F& a,b∈E. Then a and b have the same algebraic property iff irr(a,F)=irr(b,F)."
What's mean algebraic property in that sentense? If you explain me, I will be happy:)Thanks. Have a nice day:)
I don't have the book. But what Fraleigh is trying to say is the following:

Let $a, b\in K$ be algebraic over $F$ satisfying $irr(a, F)=irr(b, F)$. Then there is a "natural isomorphism" between $F(a)$ and $F(b)$ which is identity on $F$.

The isomorphism is given by $\phi:F(a)\to F(b)$, where $\phi(p(a))=p(b)$ for all $p(x)\in F[x]$.

The fact that $\phi$ is well defined requires $irr(a, F)=irr(b, F)$.
 
caffeinemachine said:
I don't have the book. But what Fraleigh is trying to say is the following:

Let $a, b\in K$ be algebraic over $F$ satisfying $irr(a, F)=irr(b, F)$. Then there is a "natural isomorphism" between $F(a)$ and $F(b)$ which is identity on $F$.

The isomorphism is given by $\phi:F(a)\to F(b)$, where $\phi(p(a))=p(b)$ for all $p(x)\in F[x]$.

The fact that $\phi$ is well defined requires $irr(a, F)=irr(b, F)$.
Thanks! I understand it! F(a)and F(b) are isomorphic so we can think that they have the same algebraic constructure and algebraic properties. Thank you:)
 
Thread 'Determine whether ##125## is a unit in ##\mathbb{Z_471}##'
This is the question, I understand the concept, in ##\mathbb{Z_n}## an element is a is a unit if and only if gcd( a,n) =1. My understanding of backwards substitution, ... i have using Euclidean algorithm, ##471 = 3⋅121 + 108## ##121 = 1⋅108 + 13## ##108 =8⋅13+4## ##13=3⋅4+1## ##4=4⋅1+0## using back-substitution, ##1=13-3⋅4## ##=(121-1⋅108)-3(108-8⋅13)## ... ##= 121-(471-3⋅121)-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24(471-3⋅121## ##=121-471+3⋅121-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24⋅471+72⋅121##...

Similar threads

Back
Top